2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An XFEM based uncertainty study on crack growth in welded joints with defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al (2019a) employed a finite element method (FEM) to simulate the crack propagation of rib-to-deck single-sided welded joints, and validated it against fatigue experiments. Wang et al (2016) employed the extended FEM to simulate the fatigue crack growth of rib-to-deck welded joints. Previous studies mainly dealt with two-dimensional (2D) problems to simulate crack growth of rib-to-deck welded joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2019a) employed a finite element method (FEM) to simulate the crack propagation of rib-to-deck single-sided welded joints, and validated it against fatigue experiments. Wang et al (2016) employed the extended FEM to simulate the fatigue crack growth of rib-to-deck welded joints. Previous studies mainly dealt with two-dimensional (2D) problems to simulate crack growth of rib-to-deck welded joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherent defects become insignificant even though they are getting really close to the crack tip. The cracking behavior does not appear to be influenced by neighboring porosities, presumably because their small size mainly less than 40 μm for the weld, as well as the rounded morphology with a mean sphericity of approximately 0.6 give rise to relatively small stress concentration degree around the long crack . The crack driving force is mainly dominated by the crack length at that moment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cracking behavior does not appear to be influenced by neighboring porosities, presumably because their small size mainly less than 40 μm for the weld, as well as the rounded morphology with a mean sphericity of approximately 0.6 give rise to relatively small stress concentration degree around the long crack. 9,28,32 The crack driving force is mainly dominated by the crack length at that moment. Porosity appears to have little influence on the stable growth rate, 30 as confirmed in Figure 11B.…”
Section: Fatigue Cracking Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model consists of the frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal bones, and they are connected with sutures. The model was analyzed with the extended FE method (X-FEM) [8][9][10], and a forming limit diagram (FLD) was embedded in the model. An FLD shows the probability of fracture occurrence with respect to the maximum and minimum strains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%