1996
DOI: 10.1021/ja953691l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic and Chemical Reactivity Study of Routes to Functionalization of Etched InP Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming 1/3 of these are occupied with TFMBE ͑so that the TFMBE number density is similar to that in liquid TFMBB͒, we expect to find at most 2ϫ10 17 ligands on the surface. The agreement of this estimate with that from the above-given NMR measurements is fortuitous, as it is known that TFMBB does not react with the In rich ͑111͒A face of single crystal InP, 33,34 so it seems unlikely that we could have achieved close to 100% coverage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming 1/3 of these are occupied with TFMBE ͑so that the TFMBE number density is similar to that in liquid TFMBB͒, we expect to find at most 2ϫ10 17 ligands on the surface. The agreement of this estimate with that from the above-given NMR measurements is fortuitous, as it is known that TFMBB does not react with the In rich ͑111͒A face of single crystal InP, 33,34 so it seems unlikely that we could have achieved close to 100% coverage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The binding of the methylene carbon is thought to be through residual -OH functionalities on the InP surface. 34 The powder was then washed four times with neat acetonitrile to remove any unbound TFMBB and then dried in air. 186 mg of the sample were used for NMR experiments, while the remaining ϳ100 mg was used for surface area measurements.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface passivation of semiconductors, such as gallium arsenide (GaAs) and indium phosphide (InP), is of great significance to the performance characteristics of optoelectronic and photovoltaic devices, and other devices. The control of surface electronic characteristics and reactivity is also important for fundamental studies of electron transfer at the solid−liquid interface and photocatalysis. For InP, a few studies have reported on the chemical modification of the surface with thiol compounds, such as hydrogen sulfide H 2 S, , ammonium sulfide (NH 4 ) 2 S, and alkanethiols C n H 2 n +1 SH. , An alternative approach to the modification of oxidized InP surfaces (via an OH functionality) was presented by Sturzenegger and Lewis the formation of a SAM of alkanethiols on InP has not yet been fully characterized. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure afforded a useful route to molecular level control over the adhesion of conducting polymers onto the InP surface . In a recent X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and chemical reactivity study, the reactivity of the P-rich (111)B InP surface with alkyl halides, benzyl halides, and silyl halides was ascribed predominantly to surface hydroxyl moieties . In this manuscript, we provide a full description of these surface reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%