2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2001.10972
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Upper Bound of the Bias of Nadaraya-Watson Kernel Regression under Lipschitz Assumptions

Abstract: The Nadaraya-Watson kernel estimator is among the most popular nonparameteric regression technique thanks to its simplicity. Its asymptotic bias has been studied by Rosenblatt in 1969 and has been reported in a number of related literature. However, Rosenblatt's analysis is only valid for infinitesimal bandwidth.In contrast, we propose in this paper an upper bound of the bias which holds for finite bandwidths. Moreover, contrarily to the classic analysis we allow for discontinuous first order derivative of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Term A is the bias of Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression, as it is possible to observe in [33], therefore Theorem 2 applies…”
Section: Bias Of the Nonparametric Bellman Equationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Term A is the bias of Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression, as it is possible to observe in [33], therefore Theorem 2 applies…”
Section: Bias Of the Nonparametric Bellman Equationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, this asymptotic behavior is valid only for infinitesimal bandwidth, infinite samples (h → 0, nh → ∞) and requires the knowledge of the regression function and of the sampling distribution. In a recent work, we propose an upper bound of the bias that is also valid for finite bandwidths [33]. We show under some Lipschitz conditions that the bound of the Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression bias does not depend on the samples' distribution, which is a desirable property in off-policy scenarios.…”
Section: A Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%