“…Finally, working along lines quite similar to those in [23], Grigor'eva and Popov [11,10] claimed that c nu ă 22.2417 in the general, non-iid case. However, there appears to be the same kind of errors there: compare [10, (9) and (11)] with [23, (14) and ( 16)], respectively. This leaves, for now, 31.935 as the best (possibly correctly) established nonuniform BE constant factor c nu -in the general, non-iid case.…”