2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An UPLC–MS/MS method for the quantitation of vortioxetine in rat plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both methods utilize a gradient elution and the samples were prepared with protein precipitation (PPT). Compared with the previous published UHPLC‐MS/MS method for the detection of VOT in rat plasma , the run time in our method is 3.0 min, which is shorter than the reported method, and so our procedure has a time‐saving advantage. In addition, LLE is utilized for sample preparation in our method, as samples treated by LLE are cleaner than if treated by PPT, and thus, can protect columns and instruments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Both methods utilize a gradient elution and the samples were prepared with protein precipitation (PPT). Compared with the previous published UHPLC‐MS/MS method for the detection of VOT in rat plasma , the run time in our method is 3.0 min, which is shorter than the reported method, and so our procedure has a time‐saving advantage. In addition, LLE is utilized for sample preparation in our method, as samples treated by LLE are cleaner than if treated by PPT, and thus, can protect columns and instruments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…According to previous research, trifluoroacetic acid (Liu et al, 2016) and formic acid Gu et al, 2015;Huang et al, 2016) were used as mobile phase additives; therefore, ACN (30-50%) and water with trifluoroacetic acid, formic acid or acetic acid, at different concentrations (0.02-0.1%) were tested, but VOR eluted with the solvent front and with low efficiency and symmetry. In order to obtain a fast analysis, initial trials were started using a monolithic column: a Chromolith ® Performance RP 18 column (100 × 3 mm) was tested.…”
Section: Optimization Of Chromatographic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016) for determination of genotoxic impurity from the synthesis route. There are other methods for determination of VOR in biological samples, such as UPLC-MS methods for analysis in rat plasma (Gu et al, 2015;Huang et al, 2016), HPLC-DAD and HPLC-MS analysis in human serum and saliva (Wróblewski et al, 2017), and HPLC-MS and UPLC-MS methods for the quantification of VOR and its major human metabolite in human plasma (Kall, Rohde, & Jorgensen, 2015). To the authors' knowledge, there is no method for the determination of VOR in presence of its mayor DP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper, the 13 C-labeled analogs of the analytes were applied and MS detection was used. Gu et al described the ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method for quantitation of vortioxetine in rat plasma on the C18 column with mobile phase containing 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile with gradient elution [11]. The sample preparation in the above procedure relays on the protein precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, oral fluid is gaining importance as a specimen in clinical and forensic toxicology for determination of many antidepressants or sedative drugs. This is also reflected in a significant increase in the interest in oral fluid drug analysis in recent years [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%