2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis investigating perihematomal edema and clinical outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies should aim to identify if any biomarker is associated with both, since such a biomarker could either be a prognostic marker after ICH or act as an inflammatory mediator which would be more likely to be a potential therapeutic target. Since both animal studies and human studies (of brain tissue and serum) suggest the involvement of inflammatory pathways such as IL-1, HMGB-1, TNF in the perihaematomal region 133 and the development of PHO 126 , and PHO itself is associated with outcome after ICH 134 , 135 , it is plausible that one or more such biomarkers could be involved in the inflammatory response in the brain following ICH.’ Modulating the neuroinflammatory response after ICH, for example by using an IL-1 receptor antagonist (NCT04834388) may therefore hold promise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future studies should aim to identify if any biomarker is associated with both, since such a biomarker could either be a prognostic marker after ICH or act as an inflammatory mediator which would be more likely to be a potential therapeutic target. Since both animal studies and human studies (of brain tissue and serum) suggest the involvement of inflammatory pathways such as IL-1, HMGB-1, TNF in the perihaematomal region 133 and the development of PHO 126 , and PHO itself is associated with outcome after ICH 134 , 135 , it is plausible that one or more such biomarkers could be involved in the inflammatory response in the brain following ICH.’ Modulating the neuroinflammatory response after ICH, for example by using an IL-1 receptor antagonist (NCT04834388) may therefore hold promise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the studies included in meta-analysis reported whether the biomarker helped to improve prediction of prognosis after ICH when compared or added to existing prognostic scores for ICH and this should be examined in future studies. We were unable to explore how variation in PHO measurement between studies affects any association between PHO and prognosis after ICH but this has been discussed elsewhere 134 , 135 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many animal studies indirectly support the beneficial effects of reducing edema on lowering ICP [6,11,27,28], but several animal and clinical studies do not [11,26,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34]. A recent meta-analysis investigated the impact of PHE on ICH outcomes and found a weak association between PHE and clinical outcome [33,35], with high heterogeneity noted among studies. The high heterogeneity may be due in part to differences in PHE measurement among studies, as various methods of assessing PHE outcome (e.g., absolute vs relative edema, edema volume vs edema growth) and timepoints (e.g., 24 hours post-ICH, 72 hours post-ICH) were used [33,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis investigated the impact of PHE on ICH outcomes and found a weak association between PHE and clinical outcome [ 33 , 35 ], with high heterogeneity noted among studies. The high heterogeneity may be due in part to differences in PHE measurement among studies, as various methods of assessing PHE outcome (e.g., absolute vs relative edema, edema volume vs edema growth) and timepoints (e.g., 24 hours post-ICH, 72 hours post-ICH) were used [ 33 , 35 ]. While pre-clinical studies are more methodologically homogenous and predominantly use biochemical (wet-weight dry-weight) methods to assess edema, differences among study quality, sample sizes, and similar factors may have a large effect on differences among relatively homogenous animal populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%