2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2020.107984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An updated review on particle separation in passive microfluidic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of microfluidic separation is evaluated according to the separation time, separation efficiency, throughput rate, and clogging filtration. According to separation approaches, separation techniques can be divided into passive and active methods [ 64 ]. The present paper focuses solely on passive separation/sorting approaches because they are easier to implement and thus can find more applications for public health, especially in developing countries or regions where people have limited access to costly apparatuses to energize the active separation approaches.…”
Section: Microfluidic Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of microfluidic separation is evaluated according to the separation time, separation efficiency, throughput rate, and clogging filtration. According to separation approaches, separation techniques can be divided into passive and active methods [ 64 ]. The present paper focuses solely on passive separation/sorting approaches because they are easier to implement and thus can find more applications for public health, especially in developing countries or regions where people have limited access to costly apparatuses to energize the active separation approaches.…”
Section: Microfluidic Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge of these devices is related to the design of effective fluid manipulation techniques having a large variety of biomolecules (e.g., bacteria, cells, etc., vary in size from ≈1 to 30 µm) and different suspending mediums (blood, cells, sputum, etc.). Recent research has shown, that there are two main particle manipulation techniques widely discussed—active (e.g., acoustophoresis) [ 3 , 5 ] and passive (e.g., internal microfluidics) [ 6 , 7 ], both of them are used in diagnostic and medical applications. Passive techniques are based on hydrodynamic particle manipulation by tuning geometry and fluid; active ones—by acoustic manipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods proposed and developed for the manipulation of particles in microfluidic systems can be grouped as active and passive methods determined according to the presence of external force fields integrated into the system [64][65][66][67]. Passive methods do not use external forces to control the movement of particles, instead they merely depend on the channel geometry, and the interactions between particles, fluid flow, and microchannel topology [68][69][70]. Although passive manipulation methods can be performed with simpler structures and allow higher flow rates, their application is limited due to their dependence on fixed microchannel design and geometry [66,67].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although passive manipulation methods can be performed with simpler structures and allow higher flow rates, their application is limited due to their dependence on fixed microchannel design and geometry [66,67]. These methods are more preferred when input energy is critical [64,70]. In active methods, different forms of fields are employed to generate the external force required for particle manipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%