2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13346-021-01074-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An updated review on application of 3D printing in fabricating pharmaceutical dosage forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main conclusions of the obtained results are as follows: i) NaCl lowers the sol–gel transition temperature for heating (Figure 1A) and gel–sol transition for cooling (Figure 1B), ii) the difference in the transition temperature for the dosimeter with and without NaCl is 2.5 °C (0 Gy; Table 2), iii) the initial phase of gel–sol conversion during cooling begins at about 17 °C for the dosimeter without NaCl, and at about 14 °C for the dosimeter with NaCl; this means that LCV‐Pluronic F‐127 with NaCl is more resistant to dissolution during cooling, iv) the maximal heat flow for cooling is at 10 and 7.5 °C, for the dosimeter without and with NaCl, respectively, which again denotes better thermal properties of the dosimeter with NaCl at lower temperatures – the goal of this part of study was achieved, v) T c increases slightly with absorbed dose for the dosimeter without NaCl; this observation is somewhat analogous to that discussed elsewhere, [ 61 ] and vi) no significant transition was observed above 40 to 80 °C but for that hardly visible (very low Δ H c ) at about 56 °C (not shown here) which seems to be related to the loss of the physical form at higher temperatures, as previously reported. [ 84–86 ] In consequence, it can be concluded that the transportation temperature of the dosimeter with NaCl ranges from 14 °C to at least 40 °C. This is a satisfactory improvement over the dosimeter without NaCl, especially for the lower temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main conclusions of the obtained results are as follows: i) NaCl lowers the sol–gel transition temperature for heating (Figure 1A) and gel–sol transition for cooling (Figure 1B), ii) the difference in the transition temperature for the dosimeter with and without NaCl is 2.5 °C (0 Gy; Table 2), iii) the initial phase of gel–sol conversion during cooling begins at about 17 °C for the dosimeter without NaCl, and at about 14 °C for the dosimeter with NaCl; this means that LCV‐Pluronic F‐127 with NaCl is more resistant to dissolution during cooling, iv) the maximal heat flow for cooling is at 10 and 7.5 °C, for the dosimeter without and with NaCl, respectively, which again denotes better thermal properties of the dosimeter with NaCl at lower temperatures – the goal of this part of study was achieved, v) T c increases slightly with absorbed dose for the dosimeter without NaCl; this observation is somewhat analogous to that discussed elsewhere, [ 61 ] and vi) no significant transition was observed above 40 to 80 °C but for that hardly visible (very low Δ H c ) at about 56 °C (not shown here) which seems to be related to the loss of the physical form at higher temperatures, as previously reported. [ 84–86 ] In consequence, it can be concluded that the transportation temperature of the dosimeter with NaCl ranges from 14 °C to at least 40 °C. This is a satisfactory improvement over the dosimeter without NaCl, especially for the lower temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of 3D printed polymers for s‐CAIS templates include resins and thermoplastics 12 . These can also be used for applications such as dental models, denture bases, interim restorations, bleaching trays, and occlusal splints 13–18 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 These can also be used for applications such as dental models, denture bases, interim restorations, bleaching trays, and occlusal splints. [13][14][15][16][17][18] One of the main issues with resin-based 3D printed materials surrounds biocompatibility. [19][20][21] Most resins used for SLA can be potentially toxic and nonbiocompatible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D printing drug has been developed using melt extrusion deposition (MED) to treat rheumatoid arthritis. In parallel, recent publications in the field of pharmaceutical sciences using other methods of 3D printing such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) have increased 19–23 . For example, FDM technique has been applied to fabricate 3D printed versions of Acetaminophen, Prednisolone, Aspirin, Captopril, Nifedipine, and other pills 13,24–28 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, recent publications in the field of pharmaceutical sciences using other methods of 3D printing such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) have increased. [19][20][21][22][23] For example, FDM technique has been applied to fabricate 3D printed versions of Acetaminophen, Prednisolone, Aspirin, Captopril, Nifedipine, and other pills. 13,[24][25][26][27][28] It is noteworthy that additive manufacturing has recently appeared as the novel approach to overcome the small number of tailored tablets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%