1992
DOI: 10.5642/aliso.19921302.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Updated Phylogenetic Classification of the Flowering Plants

Abstract: This update of my classification of the flowering plants, or Angiospermae, is based upon about 800 pertinent books, monographs, and other botanical papers published since my last synopsis appeared in the Nordic Journal of Science in 1983. Also I have narrowed my family-and ordinal-gap concepts to bring acceptance of family and ordinal limits more in line with those of current taxonomists. This new information and the shift in my phylogenetic philosophy have caused significant changes in my interpretation of re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
186
1
10

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
8
186
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Actinidiaceae take an important position in this respect because the family was placed in Ericales sensu stricto by Dahlgren (1989) and Takhtajan (1997), and in Theales by Cronquist (1981) and Thorne (1992). Cronquist (1981, p. 326) considers Actinidiaceae as ''an early and distinct branch of the Theales, not far removed from the ancestral order Dilleniales and near to the ancestry of the Ericales (sensu stricto).'…”
Section: Evolutionary Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actinidiaceae take an important position in this respect because the family was placed in Ericales sensu stricto by Dahlgren (1989) and Takhtajan (1997), and in Theales by Cronquist (1981) and Thorne (1992). Cronquist (1981, p. 326) considers Actinidiaceae as ''an early and distinct branch of the Theales, not far removed from the ancestral order Dilleniales and near to the ancestry of the Ericales (sensu stricto).'…”
Section: Evolutionary Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It effectively reduces the options for placing Chloranthaceae, a family that has been placed previously with Laurales (Thorne 1992), Piperales (Cronquist 1981), and Canellales (Dahlgren 1989) and that is still uncertain for its phylogenetic affinity. Furthermore, placement of Piperales as sister to Canellales within the magnoliids removes the order from the list of taxa to be considered as potential sister lineages to monocots, as Burger (1977) suggested a close relationship between Piperales and monocots.…”
Section: Monophyly Of and Relationships Within The Magnoliidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orders placed close to the Zingiberales and in which the sister groups of the Zingiberales will most likely be found (Bromeliales, Commelinales; Thorne 1992) all posses this stamen. In the Heliconiaceae, the other family traditionally placed close to the three listed above (the banana group), a member of the outer androecial whorl is replaced by a staminode (Eichler 1875;Kunze 1985;Kress 1990;Kirchoff 1991Kirchoff , 1992.…”
Section: Flower Structurementioning
confidence: 99%