An updated national-scale assessment of trends in UK peak river flow data: how robust are observed increases in flooding?

Abstract

A cluster of recent floods in the UK has prompted significant interest in the question of whether floods are becoming more frequent or severe over time. Many trend assessments have addressed this in recent decades, typically concluding that there is evidence for positive trends in flood magnitude at the national scale. However, trend testing is a contentious area, and the resilience of such conclusions must be tested rigorously. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of flood magnitude trends using the UK national flood dataset (NRFA Peak Flows). Importantly, we assess trends using this full dataset as well as a subset of near-natural catchments with high-quality flood data to determine how climate-driven trends compare with those from the wider dataset that are subject to a wide range of human disturbances and data limitations. We also examine the sensitivity of reported trends to changes in study time window using a ‘multitemporal’ analysis. We find that the headline claim of increased flooding generally holds up regionally to nationally, although we show a much more complicated picture of spatio-temporal variability. While some reported trends, such as increasing flooding in northern and western Britain, appear to be robust, trends in other regions are more mixed spatially and temporally – for example, trends in recent decades are not necessarily representative of longer-term change, and within regions (e.g. in southeast England) increasing and decreasing trends can be found in close proximity. While headline conclusions are useful for advancing national flood-risk policy, for flood-risk estimation, it is important to unpack these local changes, and the results and methodological toolkit provided here could provide such supporting information to practitioners.

What do large‐scale patterns teach us about extreme precipitation over the Mediterranean at medium‐ and extended‐range forecasts?

“…This is becoming more crucial in the light of non-stationary climate (e.g. Hannaford et al, 2021) and ongoing climate change, resulting in the intensification of frequency and magnitude of such extremes in many locations (e.g. Alexander et al, 2006;Cardell et al, 2020;Kostopoulou and Jones, 2005;Papalexiou and Montanari, 2019;Toreti et al, 2013).…”

Hydrological impact of widespread afforestation in Great Britain using a large ensemble of modelled scenarios

“…However, there is a limited understanding of how effective woodland is for Natural Flood Management in modifying water fluxes and stores over large catchments 1,7 . Impacts of land cover on hydrology are particularly important to understand due to changing streamflow regimes both in the UK and globally [8][9][10][11] .…”

Nonstationary weather and water extremes: a review of methods for their detection, attribution, and management

“…The Theil-Sen slope estimator (Sen, 1968;Theil, 1992;Hipel and McLeod, 1994) has often been used alongside MK (e.g. Hannaford et al, 2021) to estimate the magnitude of the trend over time (as the median slope of all paired values in the record). Different versions of the MK test exist to detect seasonal and regionally coherent trends over time (see Helsel et al, 2020, for details and examples).…”