2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An updated inhalation unit risk factor for arsenic and inorganic arsenic compounds based on a combined analysis of epidemiology studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial search identified 20 studies for consideration, six of which met the specific study parameters. Four studies were excluded because the exposure media were not drinking water arsenic levels—soil or sediment [ 26 ], toenails [ 27 ], urine [ 28 ], or air [ 29 ]. Three studies were excluded because the drinking water arsenic metric was not expressed as µg/L—cumulative exposure [ 30 ] or well water arsenic level distributions [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial search identified 20 studies for consideration, six of which met the specific study parameters. Four studies were excluded because the exposure media were not drinking water arsenic levels—soil or sediment [ 26 ], toenails [ 27 ], urine [ 28 ], or air [ 29 ]. Three studies were excluded because the drinking water arsenic metric was not expressed as µg/L—cumulative exposure [ 30 ] or well water arsenic level distributions [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non‐biologic factors include SES, insurance access, demographic location, and environmental exposures, among others 6,47,54,55 . The latter may be particularly relevant to the Texas/Chihuahua border, a former site of the American Smelting and Refining Company, which has been associated with increased cancer incidence in Washington, Arizona, and Montana 56‐63 . In addition, the Texas/Chihuahua border harbors many large‐scale polluting facilities, thriving freight industries, and an expanding military base 64 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we assumed that the toxicity of the particles varied between primary (PM 2.5 ) and coarse (PM 2.5–10 ) fractions of the PM, but not between the source or chemical composition. The details on burden of disease calculations, exposure-response functions, equations and data sources are all described in Supplementary Materials Tables S3 and S4 [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%