2022
DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An update on the status of breast cancer screening in Brazil after the covid-19 pandemic

Abstract: We have previously reported the impact of covid-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening, in Brazil: among women aged 50–69 years, mammography attendance decreased by 42% in public healthcare (SUS), comparing 2019 and 2020. In this short communication, we wish to present: a) an update of the number of mammograms performed, in 2021; b) an exploratory analysis of the characteristics of the screened population between 2019 and 2021. A total of 1.675.307 mammograms were performed in 2021, nearly 15% lower than pre-p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven studies [ 31 , 32 , 36 , 39 , 58 , 65 , 74 ] scored 1 point because of statistical differences in the most or second-most important factors. Forty-five studies [ [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [67] , [68] , [69] , [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , 75 , 76 ] scored 0 point in view of the lack of control over the most or second-most important factors in the comparability domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven studies [ 31 , 32 , 36 , 39 , 58 , 65 , 74 ] scored 1 point because of statistical differences in the most or second-most important factors. Forty-five studies [ [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [67] , [68] , [69] , [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , 75 , 76 ] scored 0 point in view of the lack of control over the most or second-most important factors in the comparability domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We highlight that this region, which in 2019 already had the worst mammography coverage by the SUS in Brazil [33], showed the most signi cant increase in mortality from female breast cancer in 2022. Also, the situation remained unfavorable in 2021: 15% fewer exams than in 2019 in Brazil [34]. Analysis that compared new cases of colorectal and anal cancer in the outpatient clinics of a reference center for cancer treatment in São Paulo, reported a decrease in newly diagnosed patients referred and an increase in locally advanced disease from March to July 2020 compared to the same period in 2019.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the pandemic, a reduction occurred in the number of cases of screening-diagnosed breast cancer 5 while symptom-diagnosis increased. 3 , 5 This finding is particularly concerning in a country in which breast cancer screening within the public health care system was already previously low, 2 , 6 with a mean reported rate of 36.71% between 2013 and 2019.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 2 Other reports have corroborated these data. 3 , 4 After the restrictive measures of the pandemic were eased and vaccination implemented, the consequent contraction in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and COVID-19–related mortality proved insufficient to restore breast cancer screening coverage to pre-COVID levels. 2 , 3 Indeed, in 2021, an increase was found in the number of women who had not undergone screening for more than 3 years.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation