2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An update on the rotational period of the magnetic chemically peculiar star CU Virginis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, CU Vir is one of a few stars for which rotational period changes have been securely detected. Remarkably, this star appears to show period glitches (Pyper et al 1998(Pyper et al , 2013 or possibly a cyclic period variation (Mikulášek et al 2011) rather than a constantly increasing period, as expected from magnetic spin down models (Ud-Doula et al 2009). The origin of these period changes is currently unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, CU Vir is one of a few stars for which rotational period changes have been securely detected. Remarkably, this star appears to show period glitches (Pyper et al 1998(Pyper et al , 2013 or possibly a cyclic period variation (Mikulášek et al 2011) rather than a constantly increasing period, as expected from magnetic spin down models (Ud-Doula et al 2009). The origin of these period changes is currently unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The sharp radio emission pulses can also be used for a very precise measurement of the stellar rotational period. However, it is not clear if the phase shifts observed in the radio are related to the intrinsic variation of the stellar rotation or to instabilities in the region where the radio emission is produced (Ravi et al 2010;Pyper et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is some evidence that the ARE behavior can be variable. For CU Vir, the pulses do not exactly repeat, although they do show a regular phase arrival time (Lo et al 2012;Pyper et al 2013). Consequently, the ARE of hot stars is not necessarily stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapidly rotating star CU Virginis ( P =0.52 days, with observations stretching back to 1949 [44]), has increased its rotation period by about 50 ppm (figure 6). The O–C data (the phase drift relative to a fixed period) can be fit by an increase in rotation period within a few years around 1984 [46,47] 3 ). This would be reminiscent of the ‘glitches’ seen in pulsars.…”
Section: Observed Properties Of Magnetic Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%