The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007
DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2007.10524505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Update on Age, Hypnotic Suggestibility, and Gender: A Brief Report

Abstract: This study assessed the relationship of age and hypnotic suggestibility in an effort to partially update the findings of Morgan and Hilgard (1973). A total of 2,660 undergraduates were administered the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A; Shor & Orne, 1962) over a 7 year period. Consistent with Morgan and Hilgard's results, we found a general trend for hypnotic suggestibility scores to decrease from age 17 to 40, and then increase thereafter. We also found that female participants s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a significant main effect of sex, F(1, 127) = 4.06, p < .05, with females showing significantly more agreement with questionnaire items generally (-.055), than males (-.324), consistent with findings that females are, on average, slightly more suggestible than males (e.g., Page & Green, 2007).…”
Section: Presence and Absence Of Experiencessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…There was a significant main effect of sex, F(1, 127) = 4.06, p < .05, with females showing significantly more agreement with questionnaire items generally (-.055), than males (-.324), consistent with findings that females are, on average, slightly more suggestible than males (e.g., Page & Green, 2007).…”
Section: Presence and Absence Of Experiencessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The question of why female participants appear to be more influenced by the procedure remains pending. Several studies discussed gender difference in terms of factors, such as influenceability (e.g., Eagly, 1983), persuasibility (e.g., Janis and Field, 1959) or suggestibility (e.g., Page and Green, 2007), but such results seem unreliable (e.g., Pollard et al, 2004; Dienes et al, 2009). Therefore, future studies are needed to investigate the possible influence of further factors that could explain differences between male and female participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only females were recruited to avoid known gender effects on sleep architecture and suggestibility (Carrier et al, 2001;Fukuda et al, 1999;Page and Green, 2007). One subject was excluded due to lacking sleep, two others did not keep caffeine restriction in one of the two experimental sessions.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%