2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An update of STR mutation rates from paternity tests analyzed in a 14 year period (2005–2018) at IdentiGEN lab, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutations were not observed for Penta D, PentaE, TPOX, TH01, D16S539, D8S1179, D22S1045, D13S317, D7S820, D12S391 and D6S1043. This could be because of the small sample size as mutations rates for some STR loci have been reported to be low 5 , 28 , 32 . The mutation rates were corrected for the possibility of null alleles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mutations were not observed for Penta D, PentaE, TPOX, TH01, D16S539, D8S1179, D22S1045, D13S317, D7S820, D12S391 and D6S1043. This could be because of the small sample size as mutations rates for some STR loci have been reported to be low 5 , 28 , 32 . The mutation rates were corrected for the possibility of null alleles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single step mutations are the most widely reported in routine parentage testing 3 while multi-step mutations rarely occur 3 , 4 . These mutations complicate analysis of parentage cases as they affect the paternity or maternity index, and in such cases it becomes important to use mutation rates instead of the routine allele frequencies for calculation 5 . It is therefore important to account for the possibility of gene mutations when considering parentage exclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such scenarios, the detection of mutation(s) has practical consequences in the interpretation of the genetic profiles. Some studies have addressed this by analyzing different familial configurations, familial duos, mother-son, mother-daughter, and father-daughter, and familial trios, father-mother-daughter (e.g., Jin et al, 2016;Burgos et al, 2019;García et al, 2019). Supplementary Table 3 presents the most updated information on mutation rates per marker and per familial configuration for the most commonly used X-STRs.…”
Section: Segregation Studies: Current Data and Missing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%