2005
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/38/10/014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An update of argon inelastic cross sections for plasma discharges

Abstract: This paper proposes a coherent set of electron impact inelastic cross sections for argon, based on recent experimental measurements. The updated set is validated by comparing calculated swarm parameters and rate coefficients (obtained by solving the two-term approximation electron Boltzmann equation) with available experimental data. This validation procedure is usually adopted when the cross section set is to be later used in plasma discharge modelling. Simulation results for the electron drift velocity and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(167 reference statements)
6
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30] This high electron density must be responsible of the high deposition rates obtained with this reactor.…”
Section: ±3mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[30] This high electron density must be responsible of the high deposition rates obtained with this reactor.…”
Section: ±3mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These coefficients are obtained by suitable averaging over the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) computed using the freeware Boltzmann solver BOLSIGþ 40 with a cross-section set of 38 states presented in Ref. 26 and extracted from LXCAT, 41,42 and including electron-electron collisions. For all conditions, the excitation frequency remains smaller than the electron momentum transfer frequency.…”
Section: B Reactions Rate Coefficients and Transport Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, these coefficients were obtained by suitable averaging over a calculated EEDF. [22][23][24][25] In this work, and we stress that this is the only difference between the models, we use a Maxwellian EEDF for simplicity. Our interest is in the general behavior of the microplasma throughout a large frequency spectrum rather than precise quantitative agreement with experiments.…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%