An Up to 12‐Year Retrospective Follow‐Up on Immediately Loaded, Surface‐Modified Implants in the Edentulous Mandible

Vandeweghe, Stefan; Hawker, Peter; Bruyn, Hugo De

doi:10.1111/cid.12322

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 67 publications

(124 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the present study, immediate loading in the lower jaw with 5 fluoride‐modified implants showed a survival of 100%. This is in accordance with other studies describing a high implant survival (91%‐100%) and prosthetic survival (96.4%‐100%) with 1‐ to 6‐year follow‐up . The bone loss after 10 years in function with implant installation as baseline was 0.50 mm (range 0–7.8).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Ten‐year follow‐up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study

Windael

Vervaeke

Wijnen

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Ten‐year follow‐up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study

Windael

Vervaeke

Wijnen

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…and D.M. ), and the collected information was tabulated according to (1) reference; (2) study design; (3) demographic data; (4) study groups;…”

Section: Data Extractionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Dental implants are a modern substitute for dentures for patients with missing teeth. Studies have shown that dental implants can remain esthetically and functionally stable for prolonged durations in a manner similar to natural teeth. Periodontal and peri‐implant disease are inflammatory conditions associated with the soft (gingivae) and hard (alveolar bone) tissues surrounding teeth and dental implants, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contribution of herpesviruses in the progression of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases in systemically healthy individuals

Binshabaib

ALHarthi

Salehpoor

et al. 2018

Reviews in Medical Virology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this review was to assess the contribution of herpesviruses in the subgingival oral biofilm in the progression of periodontal and peri-implant diseases in systemically healthy individuals. The literature review was customized to summarize the pertinent information for the following reasons: (1) A systematic review regarding the role of herpesviruses in the etiopathogenesis of periodontal disease has recently been published; and (2) a limited number of studies have assessed the association of herpesviruses with peri-implant diseases. To date, five observational studies have assessed the presence of herpesviruses in the subgingival oral biofilm of individuals with peri-implant diseases. In these studies, dental implants were in place for up to approximately 8 years. In two studies, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) was more often isolated from the peri-implant sulci of sites with than without peri-implantitis. In one study, a low prevalence of HCMV compared with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was associated with the progression of peri-implantitis. In previous studies, the presence of EBV in the subgingival oral biofilm was associated with the onset of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis, respectively. Major limitations of the studies assessed were the absence of blinding and lack of power analysis for sample size estimation. In conclusion, the presence of herpesviruses in the periodontal and peri-implant subgingival oral biofilm is an indicator of periodontal and peri-implant diseases in systemically healthy individuals; however, further studies with a statistically justified sample-size are needed to understand and refine this association.

show abstract

“…Smoking shows an overwhelmingly negative influence on oral health, affecting both soft and hard tissues. It is known as an important risk indicator for poor oral wound healing, dry socket, implant failure, and marginal bone loss around teeth and implants [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In regard to dental implants, a significant relationship has been shown between smoking and the risk of failure of osseointegrated implants, more particularly in the upper jaw [8,24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Long-Term Effect of Smoking on 10 Years’ Survival and Success of Dental Implants: A Prospective Analysis of 453 Implants in a Non-University Setting

Windael

Vervaeke

Buyser

et al. 2020

JCM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the survival and peri-implant bone loss of implants with a fluoride-modified surface in smokers and non-smokers. Material and Methods: All patients referred for implant treatment between November 2004 and 2007 were scrutinized. All implants were placed by the same surgeon (B.C.). The single inclusion criterion was a follow-up time of at least 10 years. Implant survival, health, and bone loss were evaluated by an external calibrated examiner (S.W.) during recall visits. Radiographs taken at recall visits were compared with the post-surgical ones. Implant success was based on two arbitrarily chosen success criteria for bone loss (≤1 mm and ≤2 mm bone loss after 10 years). Implant survival in smokers and non-smokers was compared using the log-rank test. Both non-parametric tests and fixed model analysis were used to assess bone loss in both groups. Results: A total of 453 implants in 121 patients were included for survival analysis, and 397 implants in 121 patients were included for peri-implant bone-loss analysis. After a mean follow-up time of 11.38 years (SD 0.78; range 10.00–13.65), 33 implants out of 453 initially placed had failed in 21 patients, giving an overall survival rate of 92.7% and 82.6% on the implant and patient level, respectively. Cumulative 10 years’ survival rate was 81% on the patient level and 91% on the implant level. The hazard of implant loss in the maxilla was 5.64 times higher in smokers compared to non-smokers (p = 0.003). The hazard of implant loss for implants of non-smokers was 2.92 times higher in the mandible compared to the maxilla (p = 0.01). The overall mean bone loss was 0.97 mm (SD 1.79, range 0–17) at the implant level and 0.90 mm (SD 1.39, range 0–7.85) at the patient level. Smokers lost significantly more bone compared to non-smokers in the maxilla (p = 0.024) but not in the mandible. Only the maxilla showed a significant difference in the probability of implant success between smokers and non-smokers (≤1 mm criterion p = 0.003, ≤2 mm criterion p = 0.007). Taking jaw into account, implants in smokers experienced a 2.6 higher risk of developing peri-implantitis compared to non-smokers (p = 0.053). Conclusion: Dental implants with a fluoride-modified surface provided a high 10 years’ survival with limited bone loss. Smokers were, however, more prone to peri-implant bone loss and experienced a higher rate of implant failure, especially in the upper jaw. The overall bone loss over time was significantly higher in smoking patients, which might be suggestive for a higher peri-implantitis risk. Hence, smoking cessation should be advised and maintained after implant placement from the perspective of peri-implant disease prevention.

show abstract

An Up to 12‐Year Retrospective Follow‐Up on Immediately Loaded, Surface‐Modified Implants in the Edentulous Mandible

Abstract: Immediate loading of surface-enhanced implants is a highly predictable and successful treatment modality in the edentulous mandible.

Cited by 9 publications

References 67 publications

Ten‐year follow‐up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study

Ten‐year follow‐up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study

Contribution of herpesviruses in the progression of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases in systemically healthy individuals

The Long-Term Effect of Smoking on 10 Years’ Survival and Success of Dental Implants: A Prospective Analysis of 453 Implants in a Non-University Setting

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About