1987
DOI: 10.1021/ic00262a046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual example of intramolecular hydrogen bonding in a metal carbonyl cluster compound. Synthesis and crystal and molecular structure of di-.mu.-carbonylhexadecacarbonyldi-.mu.-hydroxo-.mu.4-sulfidohexaruthenium

Abstract: and others6 shows that fluorocarbon complexation, although weak, may be a common phenomenon in the coordination chemistry of fluorocarbons, at least for coordinatively unsaturated metal centers. The 19F coordination shift and, in suitable cases, the observation (21) Cromer, D.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, cluster 6 is electron precise (the sulfur atom contributes four electrons to the cluster). This is reflected by the Ru−Ru distances associated with the capping sulfur atom: while the tetragons of the 94-electron compounds contain two Ru−Ru distances longer than the other two and longer than those expected for normal Ru−Ru bonds (average values 3.014(1), 3.076(1), and 3.156(3) Å for [Ru 6 (μ 4 -S)(μ-OH) 2 (CO) 18 ], [Ru 6 (μ-SH)(μ 4 -S)(μ 3 -Spy)(CO) 17 ], and [Ru 6 (μ 4 -S)(μ 3 -RNCNHR)(μ 3 -RNCSNHR)(CO) 16 ], respectively) the tetragon of compound 6 is nearly regular, with the four Ru−Ru bond distances ranging from 2.868(2) to 2.911(2) Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, cluster 6 is electron precise (the sulfur atom contributes four electrons to the cluster). This is reflected by the Ru−Ru distances associated with the capping sulfur atom: while the tetragons of the 94-electron compounds contain two Ru−Ru distances longer than the other two and longer than those expected for normal Ru−Ru bonds (average values 3.014(1), 3.076(1), and 3.156(3) Å for [Ru 6 (μ 4 -S)(μ-OH) 2 (CO) 18 ], [Ru 6 (μ-SH)(μ 4 -S)(μ 3 -Spy)(CO) 17 ], and [Ru 6 (μ 4 -S)(μ 3 -RNCNHR)(μ 3 -RNCSNHR)(CO) 16 ], respectively) the tetragon of compound 6 is nearly regular, with the four Ru−Ru bond distances ranging from 2.868(2) to 2.911(2) Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other structurally related hexaruthenium carbonyl cluster compounds containing μ 4 -S ligands are known, namely, [Ru 6 (μ 4 -S)(μ-OH) 2 (CO) 18 ], [Ru 6 (μ-SH)(μ 4 -S)(μ 3 -Spy)(CO) 17 ] (HSpy = pyridine-2-thiol), and [Ru 6 (μ 4 -S)(μ 3 -RNCNHR)(μ 3 -RNCSNHR)(CO) 16 ] (R = Ph, Et) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two lowenergy absorptions which are responsible for the compound's blue color are attributed to the extra two electrons occupying antibonding orbitals within the core of the molecule. 84 A final Mg complex is [Ru3Cl3(CO)g(COEt)2(^i3-OH)]2. 85 The three ruthenium atoms in each half of the dimeric unit are octahedrally coordinated.…”
Section: B Techneciummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, [Rh(1,5-COD)(OH)] 2 ,4a [Rh(PPh 3 ) 2 (OH)] 2 ,4b and [Rh(CO)(PPh 3 ) 2 (OH)] 4c are known but the related [Rh(CO) 2 (OH)] 2 is not stable enough, in contrast to [Rh(CO) 2 (OR)] 2 (R = Me,5a Ph,5a SiPh 3 5b ). Similarly, whereas hydroxo complexes of ruthenium(II) and osmium(II) with phosphines, , cyclopentadiene, or arenes 6,9 as ligands are known, no simple hydroxoruthenium(II) or -osmium(II) carbonyl complexes have been reported, with the exception of some hydroxoruthenium and -osmium carbonyl clusters. ,, The only related Os(II) compounds are the oxocarbonyl species [Os 4 O 4 (CO) 12 ] and [Os 6 O 6 (CO) 16 ], obtained as byproducts of the carbonylation of OsO 4 to [Os 3 (CO) 12 ] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%