2010
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual case of cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder: the reel syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several countermeasures may be considered for TS, such as minimizing pocket size, suturing the device, use of active lead fixation, use of a Dacron patch, 7 re‐tightening the loose attachments, 8 or affixing the pacemaker to the underlying fascia 9 . Although, many experiences of pacemaker being attached under the fascia have been reported, this method may not always be the best one 10–12 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several countermeasures may be considered for TS, such as minimizing pocket size, suturing the device, use of active lead fixation, use of a Dacron patch, 7 re‐tightening the loose attachments, 8 or affixing the pacemaker to the underlying fascia 9 . Although, many experiences of pacemaker being attached under the fascia have been reported, this method may not always be the best one 10–12 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few similar cases in the literature showing atrial lead displacement only, however the RV lead remained in place [2], [3], [4], [5]. The authors have explained this phenomenon with speculation that implanters subconsciously tighten the RV lead sutures more firmly than atrial lead given the fact that RV lead is the life-saving lead.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17) Reel syndrome can occur in either pacemaker, cardiac resynchronization therapy device or in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients. 18,19) It may lead to a series of complications such as syncopal attack and lethal cardiac arrhythmias, especially in pacemaker-dependent patients, as well as catastrophic consequences when the ICD is involved.…”
Section: Figure 3bmentioning
confidence: 99%