2016
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unsymmetric 8‐node hexahedral element with high distortion tolerance

Abstract: SUMMARYAmong all 3D 8-node hexahedral solid elements in current finite element library, the 'best' one can produce good results for bending problems using coarse regular meshes. However, once the mesh is distorted, the accuracy will drop dramatically. And how to solve this problem is still a challenge that remains outstanding. This paper develops an 8-node, 24-DOF (three conventional DOFs per node) hexahedral element based on the virtual work principle, in which two different sets of displacement fields are em… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of 2D and 3D unsymmetric finite element models with analytical trial functions were successfully constructed. () These elements contain the analytical solutions for homogeneous control equations of linear elasticity and exhibit excellent precision for both regular and severely distorted meshes. Especially, the 4‐node, 8‐DOF plane quadrilateral element US‐ATFQ4 and the 8‐node, 24‐DOF 3D hexahedral element US‐ATFH8 can completely break through the limitation given by MacNeal's theorem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of 2D and 3D unsymmetric finite element models with analytical trial functions were successfully constructed. () These elements contain the analytical solutions for homogeneous control equations of linear elasticity and exhibit excellent precision for both regular and severely distorted meshes. Especially, the 4‐node, 8‐DOF plane quadrilateral element US‐ATFQ4 and the 8‐node, 24‐DOF 3D hexahedral element US‐ATFH8 can completely break through the limitation given by MacNeal's theorem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, as the independently assumed rotation z  and the physical rotation derived from displacements have different orders of interpolation, severe locking behavior may be observed when full-integration scheme is used for the last penalty stiffness in Equation (47). To overcome this problem, the selective reduced integration procedure suggested in [39] is employed here: the last penalty term is calculated by using the one-point Gauss quadrature strategy, whilst other integrations are operated by using the full quadrature scheme.…”
Section: The Element Stiffness Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Shang and Ouyang [1] proposed a simple and robust 4-node 12-DOF quadrilateral membrane element US-Q4 for the classical elastic problems based on the unsymmetric finite element method [42][43][44]. The unsymmetric FEM, which has been successfully applied to various applications in past years [45][46][47][48][49], employs different interpolations for the test and trial functions in the element formulation. Demonstrated by numerical tests [1], the element US-Q4 exhibits good numerical accuracy and resistance to mesh distortions, even when the element shape is severely distorted into concave quadrilateral or triangle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benchmark problem proposed in Reference is modified here to test the effects of warping on element performance. As shown in Figure , the 90° pre‐twisted beam is clamped at the root and subjected to an in‐plane or out‐plane tip force.…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent work, a novel quadrilateral membrane element with four nodes and 12 DOFs has been developed in the context of the modified couple stress elasticity by using the unsymmetric FEM . Numerical tests show that this membrane element which satisfies the weak C 1 continuity condition possesses good accuracy and distortion tolerance when analyzing the size‐dependent plain strain problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%