IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477)
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2003.1295256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unsupervised algorithm for hyperspectral image segmentation based on the Gaussian mixture model

Abstract: A new algorithm for hyperspectral image segmentation based on the statistical approach is presented. The algorithm is completely unsupervised and relies only on the spectral information. The hyperspectral image is statistically characterized by means of the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). Preliminary results obtained on experimental data are presented and discussed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To be able to visually compare the 6 images, we mapped the colors taking the 64-scan GMM case as a reference since it has the highest k, and mapping to minimize the distance between the means (l k ) of the Gaussians from one model to the other. 6.89, 21.46 and 33.87. The number of classes is not strictly identical among the various datasets, but they are consistent: between 14 and 16 for the GMM models and between 12 and 13 for the cGMM models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be able to visually compare the 6 images, we mapped the colors taking the 64-scan GMM case as a reference since it has the highest k, and mapping to minimize the distance between the means (l k ) of the Gaussians from one model to the other. 6.89, 21.46 and 33.87. The number of classes is not strictly identical among the various datasets, but they are consistent: between 14 and 16 for the GMM models and between 12 and 13 for the cGMM models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach has exactly the inverse behavior. The first technique has been used, for instance, by Tarabalka et al [4] and Bunte et al [5] while the second has been used by Acito et al [6] and Yang et al [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperspectral image segmentation using a multicomponent hidden Markov chain model has been proposed in [11]. A statistical hyperspectral image segmentation approach based on Gaussian mixture models is presented in [12]. In [13], it has been proposed to append texture information via filter banks to increase hyperspectral image segmentation accuracy (SA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground resolution is of about 3 m. We have selected the pixels belonging to two different classes: 1) class #1: Grass (369951 pixels) and 2) class #2: Bare Soil (23482 pixels). For each class, pixel selection has been performed by using the unsupervised segmentation algorithm proposed in [10]. The rgb image of the scene and the selected classes are shown in Fig.1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate those parameters we adopt an approach consisting in searching the "best fitting" between empirical and theoretical pdfs. The goodness of fit is evaluated by a suitable cost function ( ) Ω P J calculated on P selected points (percentile) of the two pdfs and the estimate Ω is obtained by minimizing that function: (10) Note that the cost function evaluates the relative square error between the logarithm of the empirical and the theoretical pdfs. The logarithmic transformation is applied in order to give the same weight to the body and to the tails of the distributions.…”
Section: B Elliptically Contoured Distribution (Ecd) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%