1995
DOI: 10.2307/2261421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unexpected Change in Spatial Pattern Across 10 Years in an Aspen-White Pine Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
78
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…White pine is a mid-tolerant species that can regenerate itself and grow in understory gaps to achieve canopy recruitment (Wendell andSmith 1990, Peterson andSquiers 1995). Low light levels associated with shaded conditions may limit height and diameter growth (Bormann 1965, Logan 1966, O'Connell and Kelty 1994.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White pine is a mid-tolerant species that can regenerate itself and grow in understory gaps to achieve canopy recruitment (Wendell andSmith 1990, Peterson andSquiers 1995). Low light levels associated with shaded conditions may limit height and diameter growth (Bormann 1965, Logan 1966, O'Connell and Kelty 1994.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a number of other studies have demonstrated that competition has a significant role in tree mortality in different forests [4,17,18,30], especially in young and even-aged forests. However, other studies using similar analyses failed to detect significant evidence of competition contributing to tree mortality processes [5,15,19], and most suggested that the competitive interactions were not strong enough to result in mortality, but rather, resulted in a reduction in tree size [15]. The importance of competitive mortality processes may also vary with forest development.…”
Section: Competition and Regular Spacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of studies have found evidence of competition among plants [9][10][11][12][13], its importance in structuring plant spatial patterns remains controversial [5,12,[14][15][16]. Studies of spatial distribution patterns have detected the prevalence of competition among plants, and concluded that competition is a significant contributor to tree mortality [4,17,18]; however, inconsistent results have been observed in some tree species [5,15,19]. When using spatial pattern analysis methods, determining the prevalence of competition in the structuring of plant communities largely depends on the intensity of inter-tree interactions [9,20] and Investigating spatial autocorrelation in tree size is a case of a marked point pattern analysis, which measures spatial patterns of attributes, such as tree species and size, attached to tree locations [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the various summery descriptions introduced for univariate pattern can be extended to cover the multivariate case (Diggle, 1983). However, primarily because of its exceeding complexity, its applications to multiple point patterns have been limited to pairwise interactions among two or three types of points (see Diggle, 1983;Penttinen et al, 1992;Szwagrzyk and Czerwczak, 1993;Moeur, 1993;Peterson and Squiers, 1995;Mateu et al, 1998), which are based on the same ideas as univariate (single point type) models.…”
Section: Pair Correlation Function and Ripley's K-functionmentioning
confidence: 99%