The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22155754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Underwater Cooperative Spectrum Sharing Protocol for a Centralized Underwater Cognitive Acoustic Network

Abstract: To efficiently utilize nonexclusive underwater acoustic frequencies, we propose an Underwater Cooperative Spectrum Sharing (UCSS) protocol for a centralized underwater cognitive acoustic network that mainly consists of two parts. In the first part, to check the random occurrence of interferers periodically, the time domain is divided into frames that consist of a sensing and a non-sensing sub-frame. Then, we set the ratio of the two sub-frames to enhance the sensing rate via simulations. As a result, there exi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main objective of [8] is to improve the accuracy of spectrum sensing by improving the use of the underwater frequency spectrum through a model based on energy detection with two thresholds and hard decision fusion, preventing attacks from malicious users. In [31], a protocol for cooperative underwater spectrum sharing for a centralized UCAN is proposed, consisting of two parts. The first one checks the random occurrence of interference periodically, by dividing the time domain into frames consisting of sensing and non-sensing subframes.…”
Section: A Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of [8] is to improve the accuracy of spectrum sensing by improving the use of the underwater frequency spectrum through a model based on energy detection with two thresholds and hard decision fusion, preventing attacks from malicious users. In [31], a protocol for cooperative underwater spectrum sharing for a centralized UCAN is proposed, consisting of two parts. The first one checks the random occurrence of interference periodically, by dividing the time domain into frames consisting of sensing and non-sensing subframes.…”
Section: A Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of UCAN technologies is challenging because of the following differences from CRNs, as specified in [ 14 ]: While there are well-known channel models in CRNs, predicting the channel model in UCANs is difficult due to the presence of unpredictable multi-paths and diverse noises; CRNs have a channel plan that defines the center frequency, channel index, and bandwidth, while in UCANs, the acoustic frequency band is an open spectrum where overlapping use of frequencies is inevitable; In CRNs, primary and secondary users are clearly differentiated by the license policy, while in UCANs, there are unpredictable and uncontrollable interferers due to the lack of a standardized channel plan; In CRNs, any signal can be decoded due to the standardized signaling format, while in UCANs, most signals from neighboring interferers are uninterpretable. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the majority of works focus on proposing efficient resource allocation methods that assign a CU to network resources (e.g., acoustic frequency, data rate, and transmission power). In [ 14 ], previous UCAN studies are categorized into three groups: single resource allocation, joint resource allocation, and other than resource allocation. We have included additional existing works and have summarized their characteristics in Table 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations