1980
DOI: 10.1121/1.384448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An underwater acoustic sound velocity data model

Abstract: A computer model for generating world ocean sound velocity profile (SVP) information is presented. It employs a ’’least-squares’’ predictor to combine National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC) archival SVP data with any amount of available new sound velocity measurements that might be available. A technique is presented in the paper for the analysis of NODC World Ocean SVP data which is highly efficient. The technique is called empirical orthonormal function (EOF) analysis and it is capable of a very large com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the equivalent time delay error dq ti is corrected but the sound ray tracing is not implemented in the calculation of measurement distances, based on the impact of sound velocity on the measurement distances, the equivalent SVP error can be considered as a constant and estimated when incident angles of these measurement distances are changeless [9]. The coefficient matrix changes from B to F as Eq.…”
Section: The Improved Intersection Positioning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the equivalent time delay error dq ti is corrected but the sound ray tracing is not implemented in the calculation of measurement distances, based on the impact of sound velocity on the measurement distances, the equivalent SVP error can be considered as a constant and estimated when incident angles of these measurement distances are changeless [9]. The coefficient matrix changes from B to F as Eq.…”
Section: The Improved Intersection Positioning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this depth notation, we can partition the covariance matrix of secondary data into different depth ranges, i.e., (2) where the element or is the autocovariance or cross covariance between the secondary data in the depth ranges and , and . Simple matrix manipulation also shows that (3) where the subscribed indicates the portion of the EOFs in the corresponding depth range ( or ).…”
Section: A Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, LeBlanc and Middleton [3] first applied EOF analysis to sound-speed data in the Atlantic Ocean. Also, Newhall et al [4] used a spatial EOF interpolation to construct a 3-D sound-speed field for acoustic ray tracing modeling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EOFs are eigenvectors of the SSP covariance matrix which is usually estimated from onsite and/or historical SSP measurements. 32 Each eigenvector represents one mode of the SSP variation with depth, while the corresponding eigenvalue indicates the amount of energy in that mode. A range-averaged SSP can be described by a mean profile, cðzÞ (z is depth), plus some zero-mean random perturbations, which are often expressed in terms of a set of EOFs, so that…”
Section: A Empirical Orthogonal Function Representation Of Sspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the water column, EOFs are derived from direct measurements of the SSP and they are orthogonal in regard to the statistics of the SSP variations. 32 Tracking capabilities of the PF, the EnKF, and the EnKPF under slowly and quickly changing SSPs are compared in terms of divergence statistics with synthetic acoustic pressure data and experimental SSP data collected during the PRIMER experiment and the ASIAEX (Asian Seas International Acoustics Experiment) ECS (East China Sea) 2001 experiment, respectively. Because the running time is an important fact in the tracking problem, the complexity analysis of the algorithms is also performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%