2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-021-01361-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Underappreciated Cytomorphological Feature of Secretory Carcinoma of Salivary Gland on Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Case Report with Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, whereas some studies have described cytoplasmic vacuoles containing colloidlike substances, 66 others have described well-defined bright pink cytoplasmic vacuoles. 67 An earlier study described two additional morphological patterns in SC FNA smears: (1) hypercellular smears composed of cellular fragments of variable size with sheet-like or papillary architecture together with occasional singly dispersed neoplastic cells and (2) a predominance of single neoplastic cells mixed with histiocytes and granular debris. 68 As with the other rare salivary gland neoplasms, the morphological features of SC often overlap with other more common neoplastic entities.…”
Section: Secretory Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, whereas some studies have described cytoplasmic vacuoles containing colloidlike substances, 66 others have described well-defined bright pink cytoplasmic vacuoles. 67 An earlier study described two additional morphological patterns in SC FNA smears: (1) hypercellular smears composed of cellular fragments of variable size with sheet-like or papillary architecture together with occasional singly dispersed neoplastic cells and (2) a predominance of single neoplastic cells mixed with histiocytes and granular debris. 68 As with the other rare salivary gland neoplasms, the morphological features of SC often overlap with other more common neoplastic entities.…”
Section: Secretory Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon immunocytochemical analysis, SC is generally positive for S100 and mammaglobin, but negative for p63 and DOG1; by contrast, AciCC is usually positive for DOG1, but negative for S100 (only sometimes focally positive) p63 and mammaglobin; low-grade MEC instead is positive for p63 and negative for S100. 67 Notably, a major distinctive feature of SC is positive nuclear immunocytochemical staining for panTRK. 69 Regarding the presence of distinctive gene fusions, SC shows an ETV6::NTRK3 gene fusion in >90% of cases, and can thus be considered highly specific.…”
Section: Secretory Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, a total of 17 studies were included in the evaluation (Fig. 1) [11,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%