An uncritical encounter between anthropology and psychiatry

Abstract

In what ways do two bodies of knowledge meet? Anthropology and psychiatry most often meet in a mood of mutual suspicion, the danger of which is that each confronts (or avoids) the other as a straw man. In this introduction I describe a refreshingly different encounter in which a group of psychiatrists from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in Delhi respond to an anthropological text, Veena Das's Affliction: Health, Disease, Poverty, which engages with lives and issues quite similar to those encountered by these psychiatrists in their clinical practice. Rather than rehearsing relatively predictable debates (for instance on the importance, or lack thereof, of 'culture', often assumed to be the sole meeting ground between anthropology and psychiatry), what is instead surprising in the psychiatrists' engagement with Affliction is their recognition of a shared terrain of uncertainty and complexity that moves across the realms of the spiritual, the 'vernacular' uses of biomedical terms, and the political economy of health. I outline three domains of inquiry that this interdisciplinary discussion opens up as regards the study of mental health and illness: 1) ecologies, circuits, and tempos rather than institutions and subjectivity; 2) not-yet ontologies and etiologies; and 3) methodological consequences, beyond quantitative/qualitative divides and towards patterns, singularities, and modes of attunement.

Devotee/Ethnographer: My Struggle at the Boundary Walls of Participant Observation

“…Psychology and psychoanalysis have sometimes paid attention to mystical/religious experience (see generally, (Meissner 1986;Lacan 1998), and within anthropology/sociology, see (Obeysekere 2012;Pandolfo 2019;Sosteric 2017)). In this conversation, Bhrigupati Singh's comment on the encounter between anthropology and psychiatry from his fieldwork in collaboration with psychiatrists in Delhi, is most significant (Singh 2017). Acknowledging the presence of such debates about religious/mystical experience within the psychological sciences, this article veers towards to experiential register, paying close attention to the quality of being in the earthly world, while intuiting the presence of other worlds within it.…”