2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unconventional restraining system for limiting the seismic movements of isolated bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The answer to the question of whether such innovative solutions can exist is affirmative, but these are not expected to be conventional. These solutions are associated, on a case-bycase basis, either with the exploitation of the two abutments [10,11], or with the exploitation of the stiffness of the approach embankments at the ends of the bridge [12,13], or by anchoring the deck to the ends of adjacent tunnels [14]. This exploitation is possible through the extension of the deck slab on either side of the bridge, and with its connection to one of the aforementioned members, depending on the case [15,16].…”
Section: Capabilities Of Innovations On Earthquake-resistant Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer to the question of whether such innovative solutions can exist is affirmative, but these are not expected to be conventional. These solutions are associated, on a case-bycase basis, either with the exploitation of the two abutments [10,11], or with the exploitation of the stiffness of the approach embankments at the ends of the bridge [12,13], or by anchoring the deck to the ends of adjacent tunnels [14]. This exploitation is possible through the extension of the deck slab on either side of the bridge, and with its connection to one of the aforementioned members, depending on the case [15,16].…”
Section: Capabilities Of Innovations On Earthquake-resistant Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They improve aesthetics and earthquake resistance compared to traditional systems with expansion joints, bearings and other structural releases which permit expansion/contraction due to thermal actions, creep and shrinkage. The design of bridges has to accommodate both serviceability and earthquake resistance, which are conflicting components of the same problem and they impose opposite design requirements [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies [6][7] showed that the reduction in the demand can also be achieved by the abutment and backfill soil participation which contribute to the enhancement of the earthquake resistance of bridges. The advantages of this seismic participation are reflected on the construction cost of the bridge [8], as smaller pier cross-sections meet Code's requirements as well as bridge aesthetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%