1960
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)32655-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unclassifiable Tumor of the Esophagus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present 56 pseudosarcomas [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and 127 carcinosarcomas (including a personal observation) [1, have been reported in the literature. Men comprised 82.6% and 80.4%, respectively, with the male/female ratios 4.7:1.0 and 4.1:1.0, respectively.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present 56 pseudosarcomas [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and 127 carcinosarcomas (including a personal observation) [1, have been reported in the literature. Men comprised 82.6% and 80.4%, respectively, with the male/female ratios 4.7:1.0 and 4.1:1.0, respectively.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lane (1957) originally suggested that these sarcomatous cells represented a bizarre stromal proliferation resulting from some undetermined stimulus from the adjacent epidermoid carcinoma. In support of such a theory, it has been noted that similar connective tissue reaction may result from various stimuli, such as trauma or irradiation (Hay-Roe et al, 1960). However, electron microscopic studies of so-called pseudosarcomas by Lichtiger k 'r,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pseudosarcoma of the oesophagus is a rare tumour of the oesophagus and, unfortunately, its true incidence is difficult, if not impossible, to determine as this lesion has been confused with carcinosarcoma and vice versa. This tumour has been well documented in at least six patients (Stout and Lattes, 1957;Hay-Roe, Hill, and Civin, 1960;DeMarco et al, 1965;Howell Hughes and Cruickshank, 1969;Razzuk et al, 1971). In most instances, the history is one of progressive dysphagia produced by intraluminal growth of the tumour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%