2021
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2021.3053066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Uncertainty-Driven and Observability-Based State Estimator for Nonholonomic Robots

Abstract: The problem addressed in this paper is the localisation of a mobile robot using a combination of on-board sensors and Ultra-Wideband (UWB) beacons. By using a discrete-time formulation of the system's kinematics, we identify the geometric conditions that make the system globally observable and cast the state estimation problem into the framework of least-square optimisation. The observability filter thus obtained is remarkably different from classic Bayesian filters, such as the Kalman Filter, since it does no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where i,k is the ranging measurement uncertainty, usually considered as a white sequence with zero mean and variance σ 2 ρ for all the anchors. Computing the difference of the squares of the distances ∆ ij,k = ρ2 i,k − ρ2 j,k from at least three anchors and using the same solution reported in [41], it is possible to derive the robot position estimates using a Weighted Least Squares (WLS) solution as…”
Section: B Anchor Deployment Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where i,k is the ranging measurement uncertainty, usually considered as a white sequence with zero mean and variance σ 2 ρ for all the anchors. Computing the difference of the squares of the distances ∆ ij,k = ρ2 i,k − ρ2 j,k from at least three anchors and using the same solution reported in [41], it is possible to derive the robot position estimates using a Weighted Least Squares (WLS) solution as…”
Section: B Anchor Deployment Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whose explicit form is reported in [41] and holds true when the anchor positions are perfectly known a-priori, i.e., a map of the anchors is available.…”
Section: B Anchor Deployment Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where i,k is the ranging measurement uncertainty, usually considered as a white sequence with zero mean and variance σ 2 ρ for all the anchors. Computing the difference of the squares of the distances ∆ ij,k =ρ 2 i,k −ρ 2 j,k from at least three anchors and using the same solution reported in [40], it is possible to derive the robot position estimates using a Weighted Least Squares (WLS) solution aŝ…”
Section: B Anchor Deployment Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, thanks to machine learning and other techniques [43][44][45][46][47], the effect of detrimental multipath or non-line-of-sight (NLOS) conditions can be mitigated. Alternatively, multi-sensor data fusion, also known as sensor fusion, can be used to help the UWB system in the localization task, as proposed in this paper [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the installation of multiple exteroceptive sensor systems can be wasteful, in terms of time, cost, and computational burden. Therefore, the fusion of proprioceptive sensors and a single exteroceptive sensor is preferable [55,56]. Most of these kinds of schemes rely on the usage of recursive dynamic state system estimators, such as the Kalman Filter (KF) and its variants [57], or Monte Carlo estimators, such as the Particle Filter (PF) and its variants [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%