2016
DOI: 10.3917/rtm.228.0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Uncertain Transition: Security, Violence, and Neopatrimonialism in the Central African Republic

Abstract: Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Armand Colin. © Armand Colin. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the notable exception of Khisa and Day, who study how practices such as begging impact discipline in the barracks, the aforementioned body of work has generally focused on how the military affects society (Agyekum 2021). This study, which focuses on a specific section within Ghanaian society-political actors who seek to influence the military-also positions itself within the well-established literature on clientelism (Kitschelt & Wilkinson 2007;Hyden 2016;Ravanilla, Haim & Hilken 2022;Miscoiu & Kakdeu 2021), and (neo)patrimonialism (Clapham 1985;Bratton & van de Walle 1999;van de Walle 2007;Vlavonou 2016;Glawion & de Vries 2018;Duursma 2022;Oostrom & Gukurume 2022). Hence, it examines how political actors in Ghana seek to influence dynamics within the barracks, not only through patronage exchanges-politically motivated distribution of favors to an individual or institution from which the patron aims to gain support and loyalty-but also through negotiations with military leaders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the notable exception of Khisa and Day, who study how practices such as begging impact discipline in the barracks, the aforementioned body of work has generally focused on how the military affects society (Agyekum 2021). This study, which focuses on a specific section within Ghanaian society-political actors who seek to influence the military-also positions itself within the well-established literature on clientelism (Kitschelt & Wilkinson 2007;Hyden 2016;Ravanilla, Haim & Hilken 2022;Miscoiu & Kakdeu 2021), and (neo)patrimonialism (Clapham 1985;Bratton & van de Walle 1999;van de Walle 2007;Vlavonou 2016;Glawion & de Vries 2018;Duursma 2022;Oostrom & Gukurume 2022). Hence, it examines how political actors in Ghana seek to influence dynamics within the barracks, not only through patronage exchanges-politically motivated distribution of favors to an individual or institution from which the patron aims to gain support and loyalty-but also through negotiations with military leaders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%