2019
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.ra118.006336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unbiased in vitro screen for activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

Abstract: Edited by Eric R. Fearon P. A. Jänne has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Roche/Genentech, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, ACEA Biosciences, and Ariad Pharmaceuticals and sponsored research funding from Astellas Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, and PUMA and receives post-marketing royalties on DFCI-owned intellectual property on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp. K. Elenius has a research agreement with Boehringer Ingelheim and ownership… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method exploiting error-prone PCR to generate random mutations for an expression library, and a model of ERBB4 activity-dependent cellular growth was based on the iSCREAM (in vitro screen for activating mutations) approach ( 29). The iSCREAM method was previously successfully used to analyze somatic evolution of random EGFR mutants during clonal expansion of the IL3-dependent Ba/F3 cells (29). ERBB4 provided a clinically relevant candidate for the effort, as it is a member of the well-characterized ERBB oncogene family but with an ambiguous role as a drug target by its own right (73)(74)(75)(76), and as several recently approved pan-ERBB TKI drugs [afatinib, neratinib, dacomitinib (www.fda.gov), and poziotinib (77)] as well as other wide-spectrum RTK TKIs [such as ibrutinib (78,79)] also target ERBB4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method exploiting error-prone PCR to generate random mutations for an expression library, and a model of ERBB4 activity-dependent cellular growth was based on the iSCREAM (in vitro screen for activating mutations) approach ( 29). The iSCREAM method was previously successfully used to analyze somatic evolution of random EGFR mutants during clonal expansion of the IL3-dependent Ba/F3 cells (29). ERBB4 provided a clinically relevant candidate for the effort, as it is a member of the well-characterized ERBB oncogene family but with an ambiguous role as a drug target by its own right (73)(74)(75)(76), and as several recently approved pan-ERBB TKI drugs [afatinib, neratinib, dacomitinib (www.fda.gov), and poziotinib (77)] as well as other wide-spectrum RTK TKIs [such as ibrutinib (78,79)] also target ERBB4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To screen for activating ERBB4 mutants in an unbiased manner, expression libraries of randomly mutated ERBB cDNAs were created. Random mutations were generated by error-prone PCR using full-length cDNAs encoding the wild-type human ERBB4 isoforms JM-a CYT-1 or JM-a CYT-2 as templates, as described in our previous work with EGFR (29). These two ERBB4 isoforms were selected for the experimentation as they represent the isoforms present in epithelial-derived cancer tissues (51)(52)(53).…”
Section: Generation Of Cdna Libraries For Expression Of Randomly Mutated Single-nucleotide Erbb4 Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, therapeutic targeting of ALK in other tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in which it is activated in an oncogenic fusion protein ( 7 ), has been successful. However, as shown for EGFR in NSCLC ( 8 10 ) and for ALK in earlier studies in NB, TKD mutations vary in the degree to which they activate the kinase—leading to oncogenesis—and in their effects on sensitivity to inhibition with small molecule inhibitors ( 5 , 11 , 12 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We previously identified ALK mutations or amplifications in 14% of 1,600 patients with NB ( 11 ). Three hot spots in the ALK TKD (positions 1174, 1245, and 1275) account for 85% of kinase mutations, although mutations at numerous other sites have also been reported ( 10 , 11 , 13 ). These include clearly activating mutations, silent mutations (i.e., those shown not to be activating), and mutations that confer resistance to known ALK kinase inhibitors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of the MANO method is labor intensive, which makes it challenging to evaluate the functions of variants on a large scale, for example, for several thousands of variants. Another group reported screening for activating EGFR mutations using a library of 7,216 randomly mutated single-nucleotide variants [8]. This variant library was generated by the error-prone PCR method, which can barely cover all the interested variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%