2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2014.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An SVM Plait for Improving Affect Recognition in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal is to investigate which classification model performs best for the log-file features and if the above mentioned approach for performance improvement also works on classification models other than SVMs. Furthermore, in opposite to Janning et al (2014e) where we solved a binary classification problem, in this work we address a multi-class classification problem and show that the approach of Janning et al (2014e) also works for multi-class classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The goal is to investigate which classification model performs best for the log-file features and if the above mentioned approach for performance improvement also works on classification models other than SVMs. Furthermore, in opposite to Janning et al (2014e) where we solved a binary classification problem, in this work we address a multi-class classification problem and show that the approach of Janning et al (2014e) also works for multi-class classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Acoustic-prosodic features as well as lexical features are used in the context of emotion prediction in Forbes- , Litman and Forbes-Riley (2004) and Ai et al (2006). Low-level features are used in the literature for instance for expert identification, as in Worsley and Blikstein (2011), Morency et al (2013) and Luz (2013), or for emotion and affect recognition as in Moore et al (2014) and Janning et al (2014e), or for humour recognition as in Purandare and Litman (2006). The advantage of using low-level features like disfluencies is that instead of a full transcription or speech recognition approach only for instance a pause identification has to be applied before computing the features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations