2020
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An RNA-seq Based Machine Learning Approach Identifies Latent Tuberculosis Patients With an Active Tuberculosis Profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we reported increased expression of immunoglobulin and plasma cell transcripts in FDG-avid relative to non-avid tissues from patients with sputum culture-negative tuberculosis. This finding is consistent with a recent study of patients with latent tuberculosis in which two patient clusters were identified: the cluster predicted as infected with tuberculosis had higher expressions of 41 immunoglobulin and 2 plasma cell transcripts than the cluster predicted as uninfected (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Here we reported increased expression of immunoglobulin and plasma cell transcripts in FDG-avid relative to non-avid tissues from patients with sputum culture-negative tuberculosis. This finding is consistent with a recent study of patients with latent tuberculosis in which two patient clusters were identified: the cluster predicted as infected with tuberculosis had higher expressions of 41 immunoglobulin and 2 plasma cell transcripts than the cluster predicted as uninfected (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…After demonstrating that the LTBI and NTB groups had distinct DNA methylation traits, knowing that heterogenicity of the epigenome of LTBI subjects has previously been demonstrated 48 and that LTBI can be viewed as a spectrum 22 , we performed a heatmap analysis based on the top DMCs of the DNA methylation analysis (265 DMCs, p -value BH <0.05, log 2 fold change ≥|0.3|) that showed that the LTBI group, with the exception of one participant, clustered into one group (Fig. 3a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate whether we could identify any TB-like subjects within the diverse LTBI group, as previously demonstrated by Estévez et al . 48 , we recruited two individuals with TB and with ongoing treatment to the study (Table 2). The cluster analysis revealed that the DRTB group clustered with the 5 LTBI subjects (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same group then went on to identify panels which could distinguish pulmonary TB, pulmonary sarcoidosis, pneumonia and lung cancer ( 114 ). This field of research has subsequently become a focus of intense interest and these and a number of other groups have identified various discriminatory signatures for the various forms and stages of TB; ATB, EPTB, LTBI and incipient TB and also for exposure in household contacts, risk of progression to active disease and response to therapy ( 82 , 96 , 108 113 , 115 136 ). Some of these have subsequently been reviewed or further validated in comparative cohort studies by other workers in the field ( 88 90 , 110 , 126 , 136 139 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This field of research has subsequently become a focus of intense interest and these and a number of other groups have identified various discriminatory signatures for the various forms and stages of TB; ATB, EPTB, LTBI and incipient TB and also for exposure in household contacts, risk of progression to active disease and response to therapy ( 82 , 96 , 108 113 , 115 136 ). Some of these have subsequently been reviewed or further validated in comparative cohort studies by other workers in the field ( 88 90 , 110 , 126 , 136 139 ). Of the previously published blood transcriptional biomarker panels for active pulmonary tuberculosis reviewed recently by Turner et al ( 137 ), four panels achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy and two met the minimum but not optimum WHO target product profiles (TPP) requirements for a triage test ( 74 , 140 ); Sweeney et al [Sweeney3 ( 120 )], Roe et al [Roe3 and BATF2 ( 119 , 121 )] ( 78 ) and Kaforou et al [Kaforou25 ( 132 )].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%