2012
DOI: 10.1038/nature10940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An RNA interference screen uncovers a new molecule in stem cell self-renewal and long-term regeneration

Abstract: Adult stem cells sustain tissue maintenance and regeneration throughout the lifetime of an animal1,2. These cells often reside in specific signalling niches that orchestrate the stem cell’s balancing act between quiescence and cell-cycle re-entry based on the demand for tissue regeneration2–4. How stem cells maintain their capacity to replenish themselves after tissue regeneration is poorly understood. Here we use RNA-interference-based loss-of-function screening as a powerful approach to uncover transcription… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene hits were scored by criteria similar to those used in other recent work (3,20), according to whether there was a progressive change of 1.7-fold of normalized shRNA read abundance for at least two shRNAs targeting the given gene, with no shRNA showing a contradictory change, or whether shRNAs disappeared entirely from all cell phenotypes after differentiation (Table S2). The 1.7-fold on the log 2 plot represents almost two SDs, so that a point above 1.7-fold the mean value has less than between a 5% and 6% chance of being a result of chance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene hits were scored by criteria similar to those used in other recent work (3,20), according to whether there was a progressive change of 1.7-fold of normalized shRNA read abundance for at least two shRNAs targeting the given gene, with no shRNA showing a contradictory change, or whether shRNAs disappeared entirely from all cell phenotypes after differentiation (Table S2). The 1.7-fold on the log 2 plot represents almost two SDs, so that a point above 1.7-fold the mean value has less than between a 5% and 6% chance of being a result of chance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tbx1 mutation is associated with reduced cell proliferation in several other tissues, for example the pharyngeal endoderm and the otic epithelium (7,8). In addition, Tbx1 has also been implicated in the expansion of dental stem cells (9) and self-renewal of hair follicle stem cells (10). Based on this knowledge, we sought genetic strategies that could counteract the effects of reduced dosage of Tbx1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xenopus Tbx1-Tbx5 are all expressed during neural development and have non-identical expression patterns (Li et al, 1997;Takabatake et al, 2000;Sasagawa et al, 2002;Showell et al, 2006). Tbx1 suppresses BMP signaling in the mouse hair follicle stem cell niche and cardiomyocytes, while Tbx4 and Tbx5 both repress BMP2 during chick limb development (Rodriguez-Esteban et al, 1999;Fulcoli et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2012). Tbx2, in contrast, activates BMP signaling in the mouse limb bud (Farin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Repression Of Bmp Signaling During Neural Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%