An RM-ODP enterprise view for spatial data infrastructures

Béjar, Rubén; Latre, Miguel Ángel; Nogueras-Iso, Javier; Muro‐Medrano, Pedro R.; Zarazaga‐Soria, F. Javier

doi:10.1016/j.csi.2011.10.001

Cited by 14 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 1 identifies the typical elements of SDIs as described in literature: [1], [3], [4], [6], [9], [16] and [17]. Consistent with the description of SDI above, elements of an SDI are essentially of the following types: Policy, Standards, Data, Network Access and People.…”

Section: Spatial Data Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 84%

“…Geospatial or geographic data describing information tied to some locations on Earth's surface [1], constitute an important and rapidly growing category of government data assets. This category of data are considered critical for planning, policy making and delivering innovative location based services in domains including disaster mitigation, public health, geology, civil protection and agriculture [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Towards a Linked Geospatial Data Infrastructure

Abbas

Ojo

2013

Technology-Enabled Innovation for Democracy, Government and Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Spatial Data Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 84%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Linked Geospatial Data Infrastructure

Abbas

Ojo

2013

Technology-Enabled Innovation for Democracy, Government and Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This same characteristic holds true regarding the SDI's policies. Oliveira and Lisboa-Filho (2015) unified the actors and policies proposed by the ICA with those proposed by Béjar et al (2012). This way, the designers that may use ICA's model will have a single set of possible actors and policies, which facilitates communication and knowledge exchange among designers.…”

Section: Enterprise Viewpointmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hjelmager et al (2008) defined five main actors for the SDI, which were expanded by Cooper et al (2011) and Béjar et al (2012). However, there are differences in semantics and terminology between the actors by Hjelmager et al (2008) and Cooper et al (2001) and those proposed by Béjar et al (2012).…”

Section: Enterprise Viewpointmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Evaluation of the Challenges of Multilingualism in Data Warehouse Development

Dediź

Stanier

2016

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ICEIS 2016 received 257 paper submissions from 42 countries in all continents, which makes it one of the largest conferences in the World in the area of Information Systems, thus demonstrating the success and global dimension of this conference. From these, 42 papers were selected for publication and presentation at the Conference as full papers. These numbers, leading to a full-paper acceptance ratio of 16%, show the intention of preserving a high quality forum for this conference, a quality that we intend to maintain in the future, for the next editions of this conference.The high number and high quality of the received papers imposed difficult choices in the selection process. To evaluate each submission, a double blind paper review was performed by the Program Committee, whose members are highly qualified researchers in ICEIS topic areas.All presented papers will be available at the SCITEPRESS Digital Library and will be submitted for indexation by Thomson Reuters Conference Proceedings Citation Index (ISI), INSPEC, DBLP, EI (Elsevier Index) and Scopus.Additionally, a short list of presented papers will be selected to be expanded into a forthcoming book of ICEIS 2016 Selected Papers to be published by Springer in the LNBIP Series.The technical program of the conference included a panel and 4 invited talks delivered by internationally distinguished speakers, namely: Claudia Loebbecke (University of Cologne, Germany), Sergio Gusmeroli (TXT e-solutions SPA, Italy), Wil Van Der Aalst (Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Netherlands) and Jan Vom Brocke (University of Liechtenstein, Liechtenstein). Their participation positively contributes to reinforce the overall quality of the Conference and to provide a deeper understanding of the fields addressed by the conference.Moreover, ICEIS 2016 had a Doctoral Consortium on Enterprise Information Systems and 1 tutorial. We are thankful to the Conference Co-chairs (Olivier Camp and José Cordeiro) and Program Co-chairs (Slimane Hammoudi, Leszek Maciaszek and Michele M. Missikoff) for their dedication and hard work in organizing these events.We sincerely thank all the authors for their submissions and participation in ICEIS 2016. Furthermore, we would like to thank all the members of the program committee and reviewers, who helped us with their expertise, dedication and time. We would also like to thank the invited speakers for their excellent contribution in sharing their knowledge and vision and the workshop/special session chairs whose collaboration with ICEIS 2015 was much appreciated. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the professional support of the ICEIS 2016 team for all organizational processes. XIIIWe hope that all colleagues find this a fruitful and inspiring conference. We hope to contribute to the development of the Enterprise Information Systems community and look forward to having additional research results presented at the next edition of ICEIS, details of which are available at http://www.iceis.org. Slimane Hammoudi University of Cologne, GermanyAbstract:...

show abstract