2013
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.21917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview on the recent advances in computational fluid dynamics simulation of spouted beds

Abstract: Spouted beds are now widely applied in various physical operations and chemical reaction systems due to their unique structural and flow characteristics. Now there are growing interests to use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to understand dense gas-solid two-phase flows in spouted beds. Both Eulerian-Eulerian (two-fluid model, TFM) and Eulerian-Lagrangian (discrete element method, DEM) approaches can be applied to the CFD modelling of spouted beds and spouted-fluidised beds, and numerous verification studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(153 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CFD-TFM considers both the solid and the gas phases as interpenetrating continua, and is feasible for industrial-scale facilities, even though it is highly sensible to the parameter choice. CFD-DEM, on the other hand, tracks the trajectory of each discrete particle, thus representing the most natural choice, but it is more computationally complex and can be used up to lab-scale devices [11]. It is clear that the main difference between the two approaches is the way solid particles are considered within the simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFD-TFM considers both the solid and the gas phases as interpenetrating continua, and is feasible for industrial-scale facilities, even though it is highly sensible to the parameter choice. CFD-DEM, on the other hand, tracks the trajectory of each discrete particle, thus representing the most natural choice, but it is more computationally complex and can be used up to lab-scale devices [11]. It is clear that the main difference between the two approaches is the way solid particles are considered within the simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general terms, all the reviewed works of this paper refer to simulations validated with experimental data and have been carried out at room temperature, unless stated otherwise. Previous literature works summarising the state of art on CFD modelling of SB [139,140] highlighted the lack of a deep comprehension of the physical behaviour of the solid phase and the absence of a common agreement between researchers on the most accurate models and parameters for several simulated physical features, emphasising the role of turbulence. This feature, as shown in the following paragraphs, is still open in more recent works.…”
Section: Modelling Based On the Eulerian-lagrangian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drag scaling factor is also applied considering the nonuniformity effect of fluid drag on the particles inside and outside an agglomerate [30]. This particle contact force shown as Eequation (11) can be calculated by linear spring model and Hertz-Mindlin model. A detailed comparison is given in the Section 3.…”
Section: Cfd-dem Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two kinds of methods that are called the Eulerian-Eulerian approach (two-fluid model, TFM) and the Eulerian-Lagrangian approach (CFD-DEM) in general. In TFM, the kinetic theory of granular flows (KTGF) is used to describe the particle-particle interaction implicitly [11]. In contrast, in the CFD-DEM model, the particle interactions are calculated explicitly using Newton's law, by tracking each particle or parcel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%