“…Up to now, great efforts have been devoted to developing sensors of physiological phosphates, especially for ATP and pyrophosphates (PPi). − However, most of the reported methods require sophisticated instrumentation or time-consuming detection processes. , Moreover, these PP sensors are mostly designed based on the “lock-and-key” strategy for detecting specific analytes, and it still remains a challenge to develop a chemosensor with sufficient specificity for one given phosphate because other structurally similar PPs may interfere with the detection. , To overcome these drawbacks, high-throughput sensor arrays have been considered as a feasible and promising approach. − Sensor arrays contain multiple channel-sensing elements and specialize in distinguishing subtle changes caused by multiple analytes with similar structures in a complex environment. − Sensing materials such as fluorescent dyes, quantum dots, and metal–organic frameworks have been employed to construct sensor arrays for PPs recently, ,− but these reported approaches still face several challenges. First, most reported arrays focus on the discrimination of ATP and its hydrolysates, , and few fluorescent sensors are capable of discriminating different PPs, especially nucleoside triphosphates (such as GTP, CTP, and UTP). , Second, the established arrays mostly rely on the assistance of statistical analysis, which limits rapid and on-site discrimination of phosphates. , Third, the practical quantitative detection ability of reported methods, especially in complicated biofluids, remains limited due to the severe interference from complex fluids. , To this end, it is highly desirable to develop new sensing strategies to achieve the on-site identification and quantitative detection of PPs.…”