The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview on the compaction characteristics of soils by laboratory tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well accepted that the MDUW and OMC for unamended fine-grained soils (irrespective of compactive effort) are strongly correlated, following a unique 'path of optimums' somewhat parallel to the standard zero-air-voids (ZAV) saturation line (commonly obtained for a typical specific gravity of 2.65 for the soil solids) [27,29,31]. For instance, in their investigation, Gurtug and Sridharan [27] reported the following 'path of optimums' relationships based on a database of 181 compaction tests (with OMC water contents ranging w opt = 7.4-49.0%) involving a variety of 'unamended' fine-grained soils tested at four different compaction energy levels (i.e., reduced, standard, reduced modified and modified Proctor): (i) γ dmax = −0.28 w opt + 22.26 (with R 2 = 0.941); and (ii) γ dmax = 23.68 exp[ −0.018 w opt ] (with R 2 = 0.960), where γ dmax is the deduced MDUW value.…”
Section: Governing Mechanisms Controlling the Compactability Of Soil-tda Blendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well accepted that the MDUW and OMC for unamended fine-grained soils (irrespective of compactive effort) are strongly correlated, following a unique 'path of optimums' somewhat parallel to the standard zero-air-voids (ZAV) saturation line (commonly obtained for a typical specific gravity of 2.65 for the soil solids) [27,29,31]. For instance, in their investigation, Gurtug and Sridharan [27] reported the following 'path of optimums' relationships based on a database of 181 compaction tests (with OMC water contents ranging w opt = 7.4-49.0%) involving a variety of 'unamended' fine-grained soils tested at four different compaction energy levels (i.e., reduced, standard, reduced modified and modified Proctor): (i) γ dmax = −0.28 w opt + 22.26 (with R 2 = 0.941); and (ii) γ dmax = 23.68 exp[ −0.018 w opt ] (with R 2 = 0.960), where γ dmax is the deduced MDUW value.…”
Section: Governing Mechanisms Controlling the Compactability Of Soil-tda Blendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the MDUW (see Figure 4b), the mean of differences, UAL and LAL were obtained as −0.12, +0.80 and −1.04 kN/m 3 , respectively. Taking into account the nature of the MDUW parameter and its variations across different fine-grained soil types and also with standard and modified compaction energy levels (these variations being relatively smaller compared with that of the OMC [27,31,33]), the errors associated with Equation (10), though practically acceptable, may require further improvement. Alternatively, having predicted the OMC by Equation ( 9), the corresponding MDUW can be estimated with more accuracy through a practical single-point compaction test (performed at the predicted OMC).…”
Section: Predictive Models Employing Mean Reduction Rate Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Shimobe and Spagnoli (2020) and Spagnoli and Shimobe (2020), it is known that the ODS values for most soils generally range from 85 to 95% (in terms of the air porosity (v a ) at the ODS values, those correspond to v a = 2-10%), almost irrespective of the compaction energy levels. Moreover, it is interesting that the volcanic cohesive soils (Kanto loam) analyzed in the ODS-LL relationships is not subject to the effect of geotechnical peculiarity and the experimental evidence (ODS≈95% constant) is helpful for the effective utilization of ODS to soil compaction control (as well as the cases of other different plasticity parameters in ODS-PL, ODS-PI, and ODS-R p relationships respectively; see also Figs.…”
Section: S Opt =85-95%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations existing in literature are focused on the basic properties and compaction characteristics of soils. Limited information is available for the prediction of compaction characteristics of soil mixtures, with the help of index properties (Shimobe and Spagnoli 2020;Spagnoli and Shimobe 2020). For instance, Sridharan and Nagaraj (2005a, b) showed that the plastic limit value was a better selection than the liquid limit or plasticity index in the estimation of maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum water content (OWC) of fine-grained soils under the standard Proctor compaction test (SP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical engineering, there are many factors affecting the permeability of bimsoils, among which the cementation state is an important parameter (Lin et al 2019;Ren and Zhao 2021). The previous research employed compaction number to ensure the relative density of specimens and study on the influence of compaction characteristics to maximum dry density and optimum water content (Wang et al 2019a;Spagnoli and Shimobe 2020). However, the impact of cementation degree on the permeability of bimsoils is rarely taken into consideration, especially at the condition of water infiltration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%