2003
DOI: 10.3137/ao.410105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of the past, present and future of gravity‐wave drag parametrization for numerical climate and weather prediction models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
143
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 267 publications
1
143
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Future boundary layer parametrization schemes for coarse scale atmospheric weather and climate models that do not (or not entirely) resolve these flows should consider these valley geometry parameters beside other effects such as different land-use types, surface forcings and background stabilities. The development of such a parametrization will be quite difficult, but could be based on a similar technique as applied in gravity wave drag parametrizations of coarse-resolution models (see Kim et al, 2003). This means that the subgridscale topography of a model grid box could be reduced to an idealized valley-plain topography with certain geometry properties by means of Fourier analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future boundary layer parametrization schemes for coarse scale atmospheric weather and climate models that do not (or not entirely) resolve these flows should consider these valley geometry parameters beside other effects such as different land-use types, surface forcings and background stabilities. The development of such a parametrization will be quite difficult, but could be based on a similar technique as applied in gravity wave drag parametrizations of coarse-resolution models (see Kim et al, 2003). This means that the subgridscale topography of a model grid box could be reduced to an idealized valley-plain topography with certain geometry properties by means of Fourier analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one of the major GW sources, convection, is often assumed to be uniformly distributed all over the globe in GCMs with spectral GWD parameterization schemes, which is obviously far from reality (Alexander and Rosenlof, 2003). The other important non-stationary GW source -jet imbalances -is not included in most of the GCMs (Kim et al, 2003). Secondly, different observational instruments can only see partial gravity wave spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gravity waves (GWs) significantly impact global circulations by accelerating or decelerating the background wind while dissipating or breaking (e.g., McLandress, 1998;McIntyre, 1998;Kim et al, 2003;. For example, GWs are important in driving the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) (e.g., Dunkerton, 1997;Ern and Preusse, 2009;Alexander and Ortland, 2010;Evan et al, 2012;Ern et al, 2014;Kim and Chun, 2015) and the semiannual oscillation (SAO) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%