2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of the immunogenicity and effectiveness of current human rabies vaccines administered by intradermal route

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent review of the rabies vaccine 28 reported 338 publications in the period between 1997 and 2018, 40 of which were evaluated for immunogenicity, and 371 publications in the period between 2007 and 2018 of which 13 publications evaluated. The immunogenicity of rabies vaccines was analyzed according to 3 criteria: proportion of subjects reaching the antibody threshold of 0.5 IU mL after ID vaccination, relationship between potency and immunogenicity of the vaccine administered by ID route and comparison of antibody responses after vaccination IM or ID.…”
Section: Evidence From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent review of the rabies vaccine 28 reported 338 publications in the period between 1997 and 2018, 40 of which were evaluated for immunogenicity, and 371 publications in the period between 2007 and 2018 of which 13 publications evaluated. The immunogenicity of rabies vaccines was analyzed according to 3 criteria: proportion of subjects reaching the antibody threshold of 0.5 IU mL after ID vaccination, relationship between potency and immunogenicity of the vaccine administered by ID route and comparison of antibody responses after vaccination IM or ID.…”
Section: Evidence From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Hung 2018 18 Influenza Review Considered in our article 4 Meta-analysis - intramuscular full-dose 15 μg - intradermal 3/5- one-fifth dose 9-3 μg Four meta-analysis suggested a non-inferior immunogenicity and efficacy with the reduced dose 3 mg or 9 mg ID vaccination, when compared with the full-dose 15 mg IM influenza vaccination regardless of age. Hettinga 2020 7 Influenza (and other disease) Review / / ID administration of vaccine at lower doses than the IM route may represent a valid alternative both in terms of safety and efficacy Anand 2017 19 Polio Review 9 - intramuscular full dose 0.5 mL - intradermal one fifth dose 0.1 mL ID administration of a fractionate dose showed better immunization than the IM dose Denis 2019 28 Rabies Review 41 (13 comparison ID/IM route) - intramuscular full dose 1-0.5 mL - intradermal 3/5-2/5- one-fifth – one tenth dose ID route were adequately immunogenic and post-exposure prophylaxis by ID route was equally immunogenic than by IM route. Pre-exposure prophylaxis by ID administration tended towards lower antibody titers compared to vaccination by IM (data not associated with clinical relevance) Egunsola 2021 29 Influenza Review and Meta-analysis (random effects model) 30 for Review and Meta-analasys - intramuscular full dose 15 μg - intradermal reduce dose 15-9-7.5-6-5-4-3 μg Similarity in immunogenicity was found between the reduced dose ID and full dose IM influenza vaccine.…”
Section: Evidence From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both strategies, vaccination with a modern inactivated cell-culture or embryonated egg-based rabies vaccine (CCEERV) is recommended [3]. Both intramuscular and intradermal administration routes have been proven to be equally effective [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potency of each of the vaccines was ≥2.5 IU per vial, as per the set WHO standards. Numerous studies have shown that WHO-recommended vaccines (≥2.5 IU per intramuscular dose), when administered by the intradermal route for PEP, have efficacy equivalent to or higher than that of the same vaccine administered by the intramuscular route [11,18]. Hence, we considered both the vaccines to be of similar efficacy in our study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%