2016
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of the first decade of Polly<sup>NET</sup>: an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling

Abstract: Abstract.A global vertically resolved aerosol data set covering more than 10 years of observations at more than 20 measurement sites distributed from 63 • N to 52 • S and 72 • W to 124 • E has been achieved within the Raman and polarization lidar network Polly NET . This network consists of portable, remote-controlled multiwavelength-polarization-Raman lidars (Polly) for automated and continuous 24/7 observations of clouds and aerosols. Polly NET is an independent, voluntary, and scientific network. All Polly … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
252
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(103 reference statements)
7
252
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall relative errors of the lidarderived aerosol properties range between 5 and 15 % for the backscatter coefficients, 10 and 30% for the extinction coefficients, 20 and 40 % for the Ångström exponents, 15 and 40 % for the lidar ratios and approximately 5 and 10 % for the linear particle depolarization ratio (Hänel et al, 2012;Baars et al, 2016;. A detailed discussion on the influence of aerosol optical depth errors to Ångström exponent errors can be found in Wagner and Silva (2008).…”
Section: Description Of the Lidar System And Lidar Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall relative errors of the lidarderived aerosol properties range between 5 and 15 % for the backscatter coefficients, 10 and 30% for the extinction coefficients, 20 and 40 % for the Ångström exponents, 15 and 40 % for the lidar ratios and approximately 5 and 10 % for the linear particle depolarization ratio (Hänel et al, 2012;Baars et al, 2016;. A detailed discussion on the influence of aerosol optical depth errors to Ångström exponent errors can be found in Wagner and Silva (2008).…”
Section: Description Of the Lidar System And Lidar Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These profiles are available with good accuracy down to very low heights because the overlap effect widely cancels out. The advanced aerosol lidar enabled us to measure profiles of the particle backscatter coefficients (180 • scattering coefficient) at 355, 532, and 1064 nm, particle extinction coefficient at 355 and 532 nm, the respective lidar ratios (extinction-to-backscatter ratios) as well as the particle linear depolarization ratio at 355 and 532 nm Engelmann et al, 2016;Baars et al, 2016). A discussion of the uncertainties in the retrieval products is also given in these articles.…”
Section: Polly Xtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small particles show a strong wavelength dependence; thus, Å is greater than 1. In contrast, the scattering on large particles is almost wavelength independent and Å is approximately zero (Eck et al, 1999;Müller et al, 2007;Baars et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%