2020
DOI: 10.1159/000508538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders

Abstract: Authoritative classification systems for psychopathology such as the DSM and ICD are shifting toward more dimensional approaches in the field of personality disorders (PDs). In this paper, we provide a brief overview of the dimensionally oriented DSM-5 alternative model of PDs (AMPD). Since its publication in 2013, the AMPD has inspired a substantial number of studies, underlining its generative influence on the field. Generally speaking, this literature illustrates both the reliability and validity of the con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
60
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, this domain was better defined by the separation insecurity facet (λ = 0.56), followed by substantial loadings by anhedonia, grandiosity, anxiousness. and orderliness 1 . Interestingly, separation insecurity loaded primarily on Disinhibition and only secondarily on Negative affectivity.…”
Section: Model Fit and Latent Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, this domain was better defined by the separation insecurity facet (λ = 0.56), followed by substantial loadings by anhedonia, grandiosity, anxiousness. and orderliness 1 . Interestingly, separation insecurity loaded primarily on Disinhibition and only secondarily on Negative affectivity.…”
Section: Model Fit and Latent Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ICD-11 trait model differs from its DSM-5 counterpart by its inclusion of a separate Anankastia domain and exclusion of a Psychoticism domain. 1 Research on these new trait models have provided broad support (1,(6)(7)(8), with particular emphasis on the assessment of the trait domains (9)(10)(11)(12). More recently, a number of studies on the ICD-11 trait domains have been conducted (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the above-mentioned limitations and criticisms of the DSM, it continues to be recognised as an authoritative diagnostic psychiatric classification system (Banzato, 2008;Krueger & Hobbs, 2020).…”
Section: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (Dsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%