1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02019980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of the diagnosis and treatment ofGardnerella vaginalis andBacteroides associated vaginitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, 8, 10, 14, 16], Instead, anaerobic cocci and Bacteroides species were both sig nificantly more common in the symptomatic state (table II). However, this observation should not be taken as conclusive evidence that these organisms per se cause symptoms as suggested by other investigations [9,13,14,15], In our study the patients were asymptom atic on many occasions probably because of previous treatment with metronidazole, which may have had a long-standing effect on the anaerobic microflora. Another indica tion of such an effect of treatment is that the number of anaerobic species was higher in the symptomatic slate, whereas the number of aerobic species was the same irrespective of symptoms (table I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…4, 8, 10, 14, 16], Instead, anaerobic cocci and Bacteroides species were both sig nificantly more common in the symptomatic state (table II). However, this observation should not be taken as conclusive evidence that these organisms per se cause symptoms as suggested by other investigations [9,13,14,15], In our study the patients were asymptom atic on many occasions probably because of previous treatment with metronidazole, which may have had a long-standing effect on the anaerobic microflora. Another indica tion of such an effect of treatment is that the number of anaerobic species was higher in the symptomatic slate, whereas the number of aerobic species was the same irrespective of symptoms (table I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Originally, the standard in the laboratory was culture of vaginal specimens for G. vaginalis (8,9). However, with the recognition that bacterial vaginosis is associated with a diverse group of organisms, many of which are difficult, cumbersome, and costly to culture in the laboratory, and since G. vaginalis can be found in up to 40 to 50% of otherwise healthy women (10,16,18), it has become increasingly more common to process these specimens by Gram stain alone, without culture (13,17). The correlation between a clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and a positive Gram-stained smear showing distinctive characteristics has been shown (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various organisms are known, or have been thought, to be implicated in NGU infections, namely Chlamydia trachomatis (Darougar et al, 1971 ; Bowie et al, 1977 a ; Richmond & Clarke, 1977;Taylor-Robinson & Thomas, 1980), Ureaplasma urealyticum (Taylor-Robinson, 1977 ;Taylor-Robinson et al, 1977Taylor-Robinson & McCormack, 1979;Taylor-Robinson & Csonka, 198 I), Clostridium dzfficile (Hafiz et al, 1975), Corynebacterium species (Furness et al, 197 1, 1977), and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (Hovelius et al, 1979). Other organisms, namely Gardnerella vaginalis (Lapage, 196 1 ;Jones et al, 1982 ;Kinghorn et al, 1982 ;Tabaqchali et al, 1983) and anaerobic curved rods (Holst et al, 1981 ;Sprott et al, 1983) are currently regarded as potential agents of NSV. Although various investigators have searched for anaerobes in lower genital-tract infections in men, evidence that they are associated with disease has not been substantiated (Bowie et al, 19773;Hallen et al, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%