An overview of the BIOASQ large-scale biomedical semantic indexing and question answering competition

Abstract

BackgroundThis article provides an overview of the first BioASQ challenge, a competition on large-scale biomedical semantic indexing and question answering (QA), which took place between March and September 2013. BioASQ assesses the ability of systems to semantically index very large numbers of biomedical scientific articles, and to return concise and user-understandable answers to given natural language questions by combining information from biomedical articles and ontologies.ResultsThe 2013 BioASQ competition comprised two tasks, Task 1a and Task 1b. In Task 1a participants were asked to automatically annotate new PubMed documents with MeSH headings. Twelve teams participated in Task 1a, with a total of 46 system runs submitted, and one of the teams performing consistently better than the MTI indexer used by NLM to suggest MeSH headings to curators. Task 1b used benchmark datasets containing 29 development and 282 test English questions, along with gold standard (reference) answers, prepared by a team of biomedical experts from around Europe and participants had to automatically produce answers. Three teams participated in Task 1b, with 11 system runs. The BioASQ infrastructure, including benchmark datasets, evaluation mechanisms, and the results of the participants and baseline methods, is publicly available.ConclusionsA publicly available evaluation infrastructure for biomedical semantic indexing and QA has been developed, which includes benchmark datasets, and can be used to evaluate systems that: assign MeSH headings to published articles or to English questions; retrieve relevant RDF triples from ontologies, relevant articles and snippets from PubMed Central; produce “exact” and paragraph-sized “ideal” answers (summaries). The results of the systems that participated in the 2013 BioASQ competition are promising. In Task 1a one of the systems performed consistently better from the NLM’s MTI indexer. In Task 1b the systems received high scores in the manual evaluation of the “ideal” answers; hence, they produced high quality summaries as answers. Overall, BioASQ helped obtain a unified view of how techniques from text classification, semantic indexing, document and passage retrieval, question answering, and text summarization can be combined to allow biomedical experts to obtain concise, user-understandable answers to questions reflecting their real information needs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0564-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Using Centroids of Word Embeddings and Word Mover's Distance for Biomedical Document Retrieval in Question Answering

“…2 Biomedical experts, however, report that search engines often miss relevant documents and return many irrelevant ones. 3 There is also growing interest for biomedical question answering (QA) systems (Athenikos and Han, 2010;Bauer and Berleant, 2012;Tsatsaronis et al, 2015), which allow their users to specify their information needs more precisely, as natural language questions rather than Boolean queries, and aim to produce more concise answers. Document retrieval is particularly important in biomedical QA, since most of the information sought resides in documents and is essential in later stages.…”

Topical Coherence in LDA-based Models through Induced Segmentation

“…Datasets: We considered six publicly available datasets derived from Pubmed 2 (Tsatsaronis et al, 2015), Wikipedia (Partalas et al, 2015), Reuters 3 and New York Times (NYT) 4 (Yao et al, 2016). The first two collections were considered in (Balikas et al, 2016a), we followed their setup by considering 3 subsets of Wikipedia with different number of classes (namely, Wiki0, Wiki1 and Wiki2).…”

Les espaces sémantiques de mots-clés : une méthode d’indexation automatique de documents par assignation de mots-clés

“…L'apparition de plusieurs compétitions scientifiques (ou campagnes d'évaluation) portant sur les enjeux de l'indexation automatique s'avère un autre indicateur de l'importance de cette problématique. Parmi ces compétitions, on retrouve la campagne SemEval de 2010 [KMKB10], les campagnes 2012 et 2016 de DEFT [DAIL16,PZFG12] et les campagnes annuelles de BIOASQ [TBMP15] organisées par PubMed/MEDLINE. Ces compétitions sont des moments importants permettant d'établir l'état de l'art dans un domaine qui évolue très rapidement.…”