2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of the AHFM-NRG formulations for the accurate prediction of turbulent flow and heat transfer in low-Prandtl number flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most relevant open issue in the simulation of heat transfer to liquid metals is the selection of a suitable method for the turbulent heat flux modelling (Shams et al 2019). In fact, the molecular Prandtl number of liquid metals is usually lower than unity (in the order of 0.01) and therefore they may not be suitable for the assumptions considered by the Reynolds analogy.…”
Section: Computational Domain and Turbulence Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One of the most relevant open issue in the simulation of heat transfer to liquid metals is the selection of a suitable method for the turbulent heat flux modelling (Shams et al 2019). In fact, the molecular Prandtl number of liquid metals is usually lower than unity (in the order of 0.01) and therefore they may not be suitable for the assumptions considered by the Reynolds analogy.…”
Section: Computational Domain and Turbulence Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the molecular Prandtl number of liquid metals is usually lower than unity (in the order of 0.01) and therefore they may not be suitable for the assumptions considered by the Reynolds analogy. Shams et al (2019) suggested that algebraic heat flux models shall be used for a better representation of the turbulent heat fluxes; however, in literature, the most widely adopted technique still relies on the definition of a not unitary turbulent Prandtl number. This assumption proved to be sufficiently reliable yet allowing the use of simplified simulation techniques.…”
Section: Computational Domain and Turbulence Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike the SGDH method, the differential or algebraic heat flux model (D/AHFM) establishes differential or algebraic transport equations to consider the dissimilarity between velocity and the temperature field to improve the heat transfer accuracy of liquid metals. Assessment and calibration results of D/AHFM models for low Pr fluids completed in some simple geometries show that the heat transport of second-moment closure is very sensitive to the model coefficients and functions (Lai and So, 1990;Shikazono and Kasagi, 1996;Choi and Kim, 2007;Shams et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%