2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of speech endpoint detection algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various sounds produced by pigs were collected using the audio sensor installed in the pigpen and then transmitted to the preprocessing module where the end point detector was employed to detect the area where sound is present in the signal. In general, traditional techniques using the time domain or frequency domain characteristics of a signal have a low sound region detection rate performance when a strong signal to noise ratio (SNR) is present in the sound signal [19]. In addition, they are highly vulnerable to background noise in the case of threshold-based end point detection [19].…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Preprocessormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Various sounds produced by pigs were collected using the audio sensor installed in the pigpen and then transmitted to the preprocessing module where the end point detector was employed to detect the area where sound is present in the signal. In general, traditional techniques using the time domain or frequency domain characteristics of a signal have a low sound region detection rate performance when a strong signal to noise ratio (SNR) is present in the sound signal [19]. In addition, they are highly vulnerable to background noise in the case of threshold-based end point detection [19].…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Preprocessormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, traditional techniques using the time domain or frequency domain characteristics of a signal have a low sound region detection rate performance when a strong signal to noise ratio (SNR) is present in the sound signal [19]. In addition, they are highly vulnerable to background noise in the case of threshold-based end point detection [19]. However, in this study, pig sounds had to be acquired from pigpens where various environmental noises (such as the footsteps of pigs and the music played inside pigpens) were constantly present.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Preprocessormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the principle of counting the number of zerocrossing values in several fixed time blocks of the data stream, it is more sensitive to high-frequency signals and loses low-frequency signals. A real-time signal detection based on an STE crossing level algorithm with an average accuracy of 84.4% was implemented in [18], and a dual-threshold method combined by STE and ZCR with an average accuracy of 76.45% was presented in [19]. Both predefined thresholds are set by the environmental noise at the initial moment, which leads to inaccurate detection for the varying noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%