2019 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icsipa45851.2019.8977736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Respiratory Airflow Estimation Techniques: Acoustic vs Non-Acoustic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respiratory airflow estimation using lung sounds has been investigated in a few studies (Hossain & Moussavi, 2002; Messner et al., 2017; Schudt et al., 2014). However, the quality of lung sounds can be compromised by noises in the presence of chest hair, damping effect of fat around the chest in the overweight population, and potential abnormal sounds in individuals with lung disease resulting in higher estimation errors compared to tracheal sounds (Hossain & Moussavi, 2002; Muthusamy et al., 2019; Yap & Moussavi, 2002). Tracheal sounds can reflect respiration more clearly while encompassing a wider spectral range compared with lung sounds recorded over the chest (Gavriely & Cugell, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory airflow estimation using lung sounds has been investigated in a few studies (Hossain & Moussavi, 2002; Messner et al., 2017; Schudt et al., 2014). However, the quality of lung sounds can be compromised by noises in the presence of chest hair, damping effect of fat around the chest in the overweight population, and potential abnormal sounds in individuals with lung disease resulting in higher estimation errors compared to tracheal sounds (Hossain & Moussavi, 2002; Muthusamy et al., 2019; Yap & Moussavi, 2002). Tracheal sounds can reflect respiration more clearly while encompassing a wider spectral range compared with lung sounds recorded over the chest (Gavriely & Cugell, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement method results in various requirements for the stiffness of the chamber, heat and moisture transfer, and calibration [11]. Other methods of measuring respiratory volumes result from computed tomography [12], capnography [13], acoustic monitoring [14], impedance pneumography [15], doppler radar [16], electrocardiography [17], and accelerometers [18].…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Respiratory Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%