2018
DOI: 10.21037/aoj.2018.04.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of patellofemoral pain—from a tissue homeostasis perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
89
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This repetitive loading could cause supraphysiologic loading of osseous and non-osseous structures potentially causing loss of tissue homeostasis and PFP. 48,49 More research is needed to understand patellofemoral compressive and shear forces and how they are associated with risk of injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This repetitive loading could cause supraphysiologic loading of osseous and non-osseous structures potentially causing loss of tissue homeostasis and PFP. 48,49 More research is needed to understand patellofemoral compressive and shear forces and how they are associated with risk of injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prospective randomized controlled trial by Grana et al on 84 patients who had either TKA or UKA, 34% (14 of 41) of the TKA group developed patella baja, defined as 10% or more shortening of the patellar tendon postoperatively, compared with 5% (two of 43) in the UKA group. 13,14 The authors associated restricted motion and knee pain with patella baja; lateral release was linked to the development of patella baja (six of seven). In a retrospective review of 1055 consecutive TKAs in 720 patients done by Meneghini et al, the incidence of patella baja was 9.8% (92 of 943).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is proposed that the reduced incidence and spikes during the initial weeks of training is in part a result of the OMEGA programme which was specifically designed to progressively condition the recruits such to avoid a mismatch in physical capacity and applied load. In part, therefore the intent was to facilitate the physical development of the recruits whilst carefully progressively loading tissue within its homeostatic range or within its envelope of function [51]. In this way the aim was to better prepare the recruits for the mandated output tests and to progress through into phase 2 (week 12-26) training with a reduced likelihood of incurring injury.…”
Section: Week Of Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%