2015
DOI: 10.1108/s1479-357120150000007001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Organizational Neuroscience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Ward et al's (2015: 26) claim that 'the ON perspective is that neural activity is necessary, but not sufficient, in understanding sensation, perception, and behaviors…we recognize that behavior takes place within, and is partially shaped by, the social context' does not seem consistent with ON's foundational expositions (see also Lee et al 2012a). Rather, in attempting to defend ON, Ward et al (2015) appear to have redefined it, as OCN (see Butler and Senior, 2007a, b;Chamberlain, 2007 Senior et al, 2011a).…”
Section: What Is Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience?mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, Ward et al's (2015: 26) claim that 'the ON perspective is that neural activity is necessary, but not sufficient, in understanding sensation, perception, and behaviors…we recognize that behavior takes place within, and is partially shaped by, the social context' does not seem consistent with ON's foundational expositions (see also Lee et al 2012a). Rather, in attempting to defend ON, Ward et al (2015) appear to have redefined it, as OCN (see Butler and Senior, 2007a, b;Chamberlain, 2007 Senior et al, 2011a).…”
Section: What Is Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First though, since it appears that the distinction is more difficult to comprehend than we expected, we will go into some depth to discuss why the two approaches are different in important ways. This is particularly important in light of Ward et al's (2015) recent defense of ON, which appears to exhibit a similar tendency to conflate ON and OCN, this time for the purposes of defending ON rather than criticizing it. While neither cognitive neuroscience nor neuroscience itself can truly be considered to have coalesced as unified disciplines of study until the 1970s or even 1980s, their various foundational fields (e.g.…”
Section: What Is Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this special issue demonstrates, neuroscientific methods in general offer multiple benefits for organizational theory. Reasons such as expanding the research toolbox to complement the subjectivity of self-reports and other behavioral measures, enhancement of our understanding of constructs and their relationships, and new ways to refine theory are some of the quoted benefits that neuroscientific methods can bring to organizational research (Ward et al, 2015). These methods would also allow for a better understanding of the relationship between organizational behavior and our brains (Lindebaum & Zundel, 2013).…”
Section: Practical Benefits Of Eeg In Organizational Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these limitations, a growing number of OBHRM scholars are calling for greater attention to be paid to the influence that implicit processes have on behavior and attitudes in the workplace ( Ashkanasy, 2013 ; Ashkanasy et al, 2014 ; Healey and Hodgkinson, 2015 ; Ward et al, 2015 ). This has led to an emerging multidisciplinary field, ON, which uses information from the brain to give researchers and practitioners a better understanding of the disciplines of OB and HRM ( Waldman and Balthazard, 2015 ).…”
Section: Neuroscience and Organizational Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%