2018
DOI: 10.1159/000490833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Modelling Craniosynostosis Using the Finite Element Method

Abstract: Craniosynostosis is a medical condition caused by the early fusion of the cranial joint. The finite element method (FEM) is a computational technique that can answer a variety of “what if” questions in relation to the biomechanics of this condition. The aim of this study was to review the current literature that has used FEM to investigate the biomechanics of any aspect of craniosynostosis, being its development or its reconstruction. This review highlights that a relatively small number of studies (n = 10) ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are limited finite element studies on the biomechanics of craniosynostosis 23 despite huge potentials of this method to advance treatment of this condition. Our group in the past few years has been using this technique to predict the calvarial growth in humans 17 and in a mouse model of this condition 19,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are limited finite element studies on the biomechanics of craniosynostosis 23 despite huge potentials of this method to advance treatment of this condition. Our group in the past few years has been using this technique to predict the calvarial growth in humans 17 and in a mouse model of this condition 19,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element (FE) method is a powerful numerical technique used to analyse a wide variety of engineering problems 15 FE method has the potential to predict the morphological changes during the skull growth [16][17][18][19][20] and to compare the biomechanics of different reconstruction techniques. This can advance our understanding of the optimum management, not only of sagittal synostosis but all forms of craniosynostosis [21][22][23] . However, FE models first need to be validated and we need to understand the sensitivity of these models to build confidence in their outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, we think the modeling approach presented here has potential in the modeling of calvarial growth. This could provide significant advancement in terms of comparing different reconstruction methods for the treatment of craniosynostosis and understanding the optimum management of various forms of this condition [32], which in the long term could reduce the complications currently associated with the treatment of craniosynostosis.…”
Section: P3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element (FE) analyses have already been utilised to simulate correction of cranial deformities. For instance, Wolanski et al focused on sagittal and metopic craniosynostosis correction 28 ; Borghi et al simulated spring assisted correction of sagittal craniosynostosis in patient-specific models 29 ; Malde et al developed a patient-specific FE model of sagittal craniosynostosis to predict calvarial morphology 30 ; and Bozkurt et al evaluated potential correction methods for unicoronal craniosynostosis using a patient-specific FE skull model 31 . Numerical studies aiming to simulate skull correction focus on common craniosynostosis types such as sagittal, unicoronal or metopic synostosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%